Abstract

Pitch is a fundamental attribute of sounds and yet is not perceived equally by all humans. Absolute pitch (AP) musicians perceive, recognize, and name pitches in absolute terms, whereas relative pitch (RP) musicians, representing the large majority of musicians, perceive pitches in relation to other pitches. In this study, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate the neural representations underlying tone listening and tone labeling in a large sample of musicians (n = 105). Participants performed a pitch processing task with a listening and a labeling condition during EEG acquisition. Using a brain-decoding framework, we tested a prediction derived from both theoretical and empirical accounts of AP, namely that the representational similarity of listening and labeling is higher in AP musicians than in RP musicians. Consistent with the prediction, time-resolved single-trial EEG decoding revealed a higher representational similarity in AP musicians during late stages of pitch perception. Time-frequency-resolved EEG decoding further showed that the higher representational similarity was present in oscillations in the theta and beta frequency bands. Supplemental univariate analyses were less sensitive in detecting subtle group differences in the frequency domain. Taken together, the results suggest differences between AP and RP musicians in late pitch processing stages associated with cognition, rather than in early processing stages associated with perception.

Highlights

  • Music, speech, and many environmental sounds have acoustic waveforms that repeat over time

  • We found a significant but small difference in musical aptitude as measured by the Advanced Measures of Music Audiation (AMMA) total score (t(100.99) = 2.14, p = 0.03, d = 0.42), which was driven by higher AMMA tonal scores in absolute pitch (AP) musicians (t(100.61) = 2.44, p = 0.02, d = 0.48); the AMMA

  • In the Stroop-like task, we found a significantly larger Stroop-effect in AP musicians associated with a medium effect size (t(102.65) = 2.78, p = 0.007, d = 0.54), which confirmed the presence of labeling automaticity in our sample of AP musicians

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speech, and many environmental sounds have acoustic waveforms that repeat over time. Healthy participants show a consistent preference to perceive either the fundamental pitch or the spectral pitch of a sound (Schneider et al, 2005). There is a special group of musicians which effortlessly perceive, recognize, and name pitches in absolute terms and without the help of a reference pitch (Deutsch, 2013). These absolute pitch (AP) musicians stand in striking contrast to the large majority of relative pitch (RP) musicians which perceive pitches in relation to other pitches (McDermott and Oxenham, 2008; Miyazaki and Rakowski, 2002)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.