Neural correlates of working memory and compensation at different stages of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract

Working memory (WM) impairment is one of the most frequent cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is not known how neural activity is altered and compensatory responses eventually fail during progression. We aimed to elucidate neural correlates of WM and compensatory mechanisms in PD. Eighteen cognitively normal PD patients (PD-CogNL), 16 with PD with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), 11 with PD with dementia (PDD), and 17 healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated. Subjects performed an n-back task. Functional MRI data were analyzed by event-related analysis for correct responses. Brain activations were evaluated by comparing them to fixation cross or 0-back task, and correlated with n-back task performance. When compared to fixation cross, PD-CogNL patients had more activation in WM areas than HCs for both the 2- and 3-back tasks. PD-MCI and PDD patients had more activation in WM areas than HCs for the 0- and 1-back task. 2-back task performance was correlated with brain activations (vs. 0-back task) in the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and frontal eye field (FEF) and left rostral prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, inferior/superior parietal lobule (IPL/SPL), and anterior insular cortex as well as anterior cingulate cortex. 3-back task performance was correlated with brain activations (vs. 0-back task) in the left FEF, right caudate nucleus, and bilateral IPL/SPL. Additional activations on top of the 0-back task, rather than fixation cross, are the neural correlates of WM. Our results suggest PD patients have two types of compensatory mechanisms: (1) Hyperactivation for different WM load tasks depending on their cognitive status. PD-CogNL have hyperactivation for moderate and heavy working memory load tasks while maintaining normal working memory performance. In contrast, PD-MCI and PDD have hyperactivation for control task and light working memory load task, leaving less neural resources to further activate for more demanding tasks and resulting in impaired working memory performance. (2) Bilateral recruitment of WM-related areas, in particular the DLPFC, FEF, IPL/SPL and caudate nucleus, to improve WM performance.