Abstract

Social networks are increasingly considered to be influential in explaining the knowledge transfer process. Despite scholarly efforts to integrate knowledge transfer and social network research, we lack understanding on how knowledge transfer networks emerge and evolve. We draw upon resource dependency theory and inter-organizational networks and collect patent data of 42 Double-First Class (DFC) universities to study structural properties of the Chinese university knowledge transfer network over time. Our results point to the existence of an increasingly complex yet remarkably efficient network. Universities and co-patent collaborations emerge in the network and act as knowledge bridges between other universities. The network moves from an early-stage single-centered network to a mature multi-centered network through a power-law pattern. Such movement allows for an aggregation phenomenon to appear as oligopolistic communities emerge and rule the network. While knowledge is more easily shared and accessible within communities, their existence also brings along control over knowledge bases embedded in those communities. Key universities take central positions within the expanding network, which allows them to gain control and easier access to knowledge. It also hints that it might be difficult for other DFC universities to become key players in the network. On an inter-regional level, our findings point to steadily increasing knowledge transfer activity, which is key to overcome the underdevelopment of some Chinese regions. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding on the theoretical connection between knowledge transfer and social network dynamics, on how universities evolve through knowledge transfer networks, and on how their embeddedness translates into knowledge control, knowledge access, and knowledge bridges.

Highlights

  • Knowledge transfer includes all activities related to the transfer of knowledge and capabilities developed inside universities to non-academic environments (Molas-Gallart and Sinclair 1999), and is globally considered the third mission of universities, next to teaching and research (Philpott et al 2011)

  • In 1999, the Ministry of Education (MOE) issued a Chinese version of the Bayh-Dole Act, allowing universities to retain ownership of research results obtained with governmental funding, which laid the foundation for the protection and commercialization of university intellectual property (IP)

  • We find that the evolution of the Chinese university knowledge transfer network follows a power-law pattern since the regression E(t) ∝ N(t)1.125 renders the highest value for R­ 2 (0.998) and the densification exponent (1.125) lays between the values one and two

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge transfer includes all activities related to the transfer of knowledge and capabilities developed inside universities to non-academic environments (Molas-Gallart and Sinclair 1999), and is globally considered the third mission of universities, next to teaching and research (Philpott et al 2011). Universities transfer knowledge through several mechanisms, including publications, patents, consulting, informal meetings, recruiting, licensing, joint ventures, research contracts, and personal exchanges (Agrawal 2001). Among these mechanisms, patents are visible indicators of technological change and innovation and form an important commercialization channel (Kroll and Liefner 2008; Meyer-Krahmer and Schmoch 1998). By improving the performance of Chinese university knowledge and technology transfer through several programs, the Chinese government recognized innovation and knowledge transfer to be the engine of economic development and considers Chinese universities as key actors in China’s transformation (Hong 2008; De Moortel and Crispeels 2018)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call