Abstract

The network is a model that may be able to respond to public needs by overcoming some limitations of other approaches. In literature, a generalizable model is often absent and not applicable to more than one productive sector. The case study uses the "Torino Model" to highlight the most frequent features and measurable elements of the network through a bottom-up coding approach by ATLAS software. The case is analyzed through interviews, documents analysis and observation of the functioning of the network. Sustainability, management and the main network outcomes are the elements that the study examines the case study. The analysis responds to the gap identified in the literature concerning the application to a system composed of institutions. The essential elements linked to know-how, the exchange of training and information and therefore the growth of intangible value constitute the essential basis for the establishment of a successful network, and this is also highlighted by the case study. The case study highlights how the network between institutions reduces costs by eliminating the duplication of services offered and increasing effectiveness and efficiency through increasing other factors such as the professional ability to respond to needs by immediately putting institutions and professionals in communication. The model confirms the ability to overcome the gap related to the network between institutions and between public and private, increasing the well-being of the local system.

Highlights

  • In the last 30 years, the public sector has been increasingly oriented towards meeting the needs of stakeholders

  • For the first time among the proposed models, we find that of networks

  • The study, conducted by Considine and Lewis, analyses all the elements that can influence the different governance models in Australia, England, Germany and New Zealand; the study identifies three factors useful to evaluate the different types of governance, concluding that the bureaucratic or procedural organizations have been replaced by models based on corporate governance or networks in most reformist countries (Considine & Lewis, 2003)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last 30 years, the public sector has been increasingly oriented towards meeting the needs of stakeholders. Key stakeholders must be satisfied, at least minimally, otherwise public policies, organizations, communities or even countries and civilizations will fail (Bryson, 2004; Friedman & Miles, 2002). The notion of ‘stakeholder management’ for organizational sustainability has been described as an organization behaving in such a way as to satisfy the needs and expectations of its stakeholders (Garvare & Johansson, 2010). An analysis of the literature shows that public sector governance concerns the responsibilities related to the specific objectives of this sector, which are limited to the provision of services (for example, the cost and quality of a service), and include the impact of policies on the community and on society for example, political or taxation-related outcomes (Jacobs & Goddard, 2007) and setting rules and guarantee rights (Bovaird, 2007; Stewart & Walsh, 1992). Since the beginning of the 70s we find the use of networks as an embryonic ijbm.ccsenet.org

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call