Abstract

Dynamic hedging has been adopted by many insurance companies to mitigate the financial risks associated with variable annuity guarantees. To simulate the performance of dynamic hedging for variable annuity products, insurance companies rely on nested stochastic projections, which is highly computationally intensive and often prohibitive for large variable annuity portfolios. Metamodeling techniques have recently been proposed to address the computational issues. However, it is difficult for researchers to obtain real datasets from insurance companies to test metamodeling techniques and publish the results in academic journals. In this paper, we create synthetic datasets that can be used for the purpose of addressing the computational issues associated with the nested stochastic valuation of large variable annuity portfolios. The runtime used to create these synthetic datasets would be about three years if a single CPU were used. These datasets are readily available to researchers and practitioners so that they can focus on testing metamodeling techniques.

Highlights

  • IntroductionA guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) guarantees a specified amount to the beneficiary upon the death of the policyholder regardless of the performance of the investment portfolio

  • A variable annuity (VA) is a popular life insurance product created by insurance companies to address many people’s concerns about outliving their assets [1,2]

  • A guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB) guarantees that the policyholder can convert the VA policy to an annuity according to a specified rate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) guarantees a specified amount to the beneficiary upon the death of the policyholder regardless of the performance of the investment portfolio. Examples of living benefits include the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB), the guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB), the guaranteed minimum maturity benefit (GMMB), and the guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB). A GMWB guarantees that the policyholder can take systematic annual withdrawals of a specified amount from the policy over a period of time, even though the investment portfolio might be depleted. A GMIB guarantees that the policyholder can convert the VA policy to an annuity according to a specified rate. A GMMB guarantees that the policyholder can receive a specific amount at the maturity of the policy. A GMAB guarantees that the policyholder can renew the contract during a specified window after a specified waiting period

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call