Abstract

It is well-recognised that engagement is critical for learning and school success. Engagement (and disengagement) are, however, also influenced by context. Thus, as digital technologies add complexity to the educational context, they influence classroom leadership, lesson designs and related practices, and thereby engagement. Despite being critical, engagement and disengagement are not well explored concerning these influences, with a lack of research undertaken within socially disadvantaged schools. In this qualitative study, 14 classroom observations were conducted, during five months, in twelve classes in an upper secondary school in Sweden, along with dialogues with teachers (n=12) and students (n=32). The data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Identified themes include digital context, teacher leadership, engagement and disengagement. A network of relations between the (dis-)engagement compound and themes is presented. The results identified processes in which engagement shifted into disengagement and vice versa; in particular, that the intention of active learning does not automatically translate to active learning for all students, although teachers employed a higher work pace than did their students. Teacher self-efficacy and awareness of how to manage digital technologies in and outside the classroom was found to play a vital role in facilitating engagement. Understanding the (dis-)engagement compound in blended learning environments is key to inform active and visible learning for future research and supportive organisational structures.

Highlights

  • Research on the effectiveness of digital technologies shows diverging outcomes

  • While engagement is often described as the visible and measurable outcome of motivation (Boekaerts, 2016; Fredricks & McColskey, 2012), many teachers report that student disengagement is the biggest challenge they face in their classrooms (Fredricks, 2016)

  • Because of this emerging indication, student and teacher work pace were observed throughout the lessons

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research on the effectiveness of digital technologies shows diverging outcomes. Some conclude that there is potential, but that school digital maturity and teaching practices do not align with the use of digital tools in society at large (Gudmundsdóttir et al, 2014; Håkansson-Lindqvist, 2015; Krumsvik & Skaar, 2020), and that digitalisation does not lead to increased academic achievement (Chen & Jang, 2010; Giesbers et al, 2013; Warschauer et al, 2014). Engagement and disengagement are malleable (Fredricks et al, 2004; Fredricks et al, 2019), and teachers, learning environments and digital technologies (and the various uses of them) may influence engagement (Bond & Bedenlier, 2019). Even if teachers would not establish a teacher-student contract, they cannot separate themselves from the school context and [Blended] learning environment (Bond & Bedenlier, 2019). Kuh (2010) refers to teachers’ negotiation and facilitation of needs as an engagement compound that establishes the roles, structure, expectations, agreements and positions between the teacher and the student. The school, the teaching profession, the role of students, and even digital technologies, are not value-free; and individuals and digital technologies are heavily intertwined, which is why teaching cannot be separated from the context in which it happens (Barab & Squire, 2004; Bond & Bedenlier, 2019)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call