Abstract

Literary prizes purport to honour ‘superior’ authors and their works, judging which books are ‘the best’ in a given year and announcing it for the world to react to. Whilst it is widely assumed that monetarily winning a prize is a good thing, previous studies have noted what appears to be a negative correlation between prize success and audience reactions. Building on findings in Kovács and Sharkey’s quantitative study of three prestigious literary awards (2014), this article reports on a comparative, mixed methods study of a wider range of book prizes, including more commercial and genre-specific awards. It explores the impact of changing reading habits and new ways of sharing responses to reading on the oxymoronic phenomenon of negative positivity. The research comprises quantitiative analysis of the effects of different book prizes on book sales and on star ratings on Goodreads, and qualitative analysis of popular reviews of prize-winning novels. The article aims to illuminate the effects of different prizes on audience response and to consider how both may contribute to literary value.

Highlights

  • This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymised during review

  • Whilst it is widely assumed that monetarily winning a prize is a good thing, previous studies have noted what appears to be a negative correlation between prize success and audience response

  • Did this study discover that upon reception of the Women’s Prize for Fiction in 2015, positive reviews for How To Be Both by Ali Smith deteriorated at approximately 30%, when compared to post-publication figures? Why did The Testaments by Margaret Atwood invoke such a strong sense of disappointment in reviews that followed her Booker win announcement?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymised during review.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.