Abstract

BackgroundIn the critically ill, catheter-related bloodstream infection can result from bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of intravascular catheters. Needle-free connectors (NFC) have been suggested to reduce the rate of bacterial contamination and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but data remains ambiguous. Thus, we tested if a novel NFC would reduce bacterial contamination and subsequent CRBSI.ResultsIn a prospective, randomized controlled trial, surgical ICU patients were randomized to three-way hubs closed by caps or Bionecteur® (Vygon, Inc.) of central venous catheters. Every 72 h, infusion lines were renewed and microbiological samples were taken. Bacterial growth was analyzed by blinded microbiologists. Incidence of bacterial contamination and CRSBI were assessed. Outcome parameters like length of stay on ICU and outcome were retrospectively assessed. Two thousand seven hundred patients were screened, 111 were randomized to the NFC, and 109 into the control group. Finally, 24 patients in the NFC and 23 control patients were analyzed. The majority of samples (NFC 77%; control 70%) found no bacterial growth. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were most commonly detected on CVC samples (NFC 17%; control 21%). We found CRBSI (defined as identical pathogens in blood culture and catheter line tip culture, and clinical manifestations of infection) in two control patients and one patient of the NFC group. Their length of ICU stay did not differ between groups (NFC 19 days; control 23 days).ConclusionThe use of NFC does not influence the rate of bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of central venous catheters.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT02134769. Registered 09 May 2014.

Highlights

  • In the critically ill, catheter-related bloodstream infection can result from bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of intravascular catheters

  • central venous catheters (CVC)-related infections occur on 1.02 days per 1000 CVCdays [1] and 60% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients require a CVC

  • Needle-free connectors (NFC) use had no impact on bacterial contamination of entry port, but data indicate that the use of NFC decreases the rate of contamination over time faster when compared to controls. In this randomized prospective observational trial, we found that NFC has no impact on bacterial contamination of intravascular catheter entry port or catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) rate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Catheter-related bloodstream infection can result from bacterial contamination of infusion hubs of intravascular catheters. Needle-free connectors (NFC) have been suggested to reduce the rate of bacterial contamination and subsequent catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), but data remains ambiguous. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) are preventable, but common healthcare-associated infections. Koeppen et al Intensive Care Medicine Experimental (ICU) treatment, they are associated with the risk to cause life-threating infections. Common ports of entry for the infectious agents are indwelling intravascular catheters, such as arterial lines and central venous catheters (CVC). CVC-related infections occur on 1.02 days per 1000 CVCdays [1] and 60% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients require a CVC. New strategies to reduce contamination via an indwelling central venous or arterial catheter could, improve patient outcome

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call