Abstract
This paper uses a discourse analysis of print media articles to assess the prevalence of NIMBY (not in my backyard) sentiment, and community acceptance of a therapeutic community for homeless persons with co-morbid disorders. While evidence of NIMBY is present, the contested nature of the proposed facility in terms of competing explanations for land use renders NIMBY insufficient in explaining the conflict. In addition to the dominant discourse highlighting the central arguments for facility siting, intersecting discourses involving the local municipal government and First Nations reveal a complex debate. Thus, the development of more sophisticated analytical approaches and societal responses to siting facilities for homelessness persons with co-morbid disorders are required.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
