Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes several near-global datasets of low cloud cover, including the the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) satellite observations, C. J. Hahn et al. surface-derived observations, and the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) and ECMWF reanalysis products (ERA). The magnitudes of annual-mean ISCCP and C. J. Hahn observations of low cloud fraction are found to differ by up to about 0.4 for a number of locations. These differences are largely attributable to the fact that ISCCP low clouds are only those low clouds that are not obstructed by higher cloud. Those of both the NCEP and ERA low clouds, which should be comparable to the Hahn low cloud dataset, have magnitudes up to about 0.3 less than the latter. The dominant EOFs of the seasonal variation of ISCCP and Hahn observations low cloud differ substantially over much of the Northern Hemisphere, where there is a sizable number of observations in Hahn. The pattern of the dominant seasonal EOF of ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call