Abstract
Abstract Massive stars typically undergo short-lived post-main-sequence evolutionary phases with strong mass loss and occasional mass eruptions. Many of such massive stars in transition phases have been identified based on their dusty envelopes. The ejected material often veils the stellar photospheres so that the central stars cannot be assigned proper spectral types and evolutionary stages. The infrared spectral range has proved to be ideal for the classification of evolved massive stars and for the characterization of their environments. To improve our knowledge on the central stars of four such dust-enshrouded objects, [GKF 2010] MN 83, [GKF 2010] MN 108, [GKF 2010] MN 109, and [GKF 2010] MN 112, we collect and present their first medium-resolution K-band spectra in the 2.3–2.47 μm region and discuss the location of the stars in the JHK color–color diagram. We find that the emission-line spectra of both MN 83 and MN 112 show characteristics typically seen in luminous blue variable (LBV) stars. In addition, we propose that the presence and strength of the newly reported Mg ii lines might be used as a new complementary criterion to identify LBV candidates. The spectra of the other two objects imply that MN 108 is an O-type supergiant, whereas MN 109 could be an LBV candidate in its active phase. We derive lower limits for the reddening toward the stars and find that three of all dereddened fall into the region of confirmed LBVs.
Highlights
For most of their life massive stars interact with their environments through high-density stellar winds
We find that the emission-line spectra of both MN 83 and MN 112 show characteristics typically seen in Luminous Blue Variable (LBV) stars
We propose that the presence and strength of the newly reported Mg ii lines might be used as a new complementary criterion to identify LBV candidates
Summary
For most of their life massive stars interact with their environments through high-density stellar winds. As the stellar evolution is sensitive to the mass loss (Smith 2014), the amount of mass lost in each stage affects the subsequent evolution of the star (Maeder et al 1980; Meynet & Maeder 2005; Georgy 2012). Despite their importance on the fate of massive stars, some short transition phases are not reproducible with the currently available evolution models. To improve our comprehension of stellar and galactic evolution, a better understanding of massive stars in transition phases is vital (Langer et al 1994; Puls et al 2008; Langer 2012)
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have