Abstract

AbstractDespite their distinctive role in regulating agroecosystems, soil fauna is largely excluded from conservation action. With increasing evidence supporting matrix functionality as critical for multiple species in agroecosystems, it is important that efforts meant to enhance biodiversity in managed systems be inclusive and effective for all species and not just charismatic fauna.Third party certifications are a popular mechanism for claiming pro‐conservation practises in tropical agricultural lands. Therefore, we asked whether voluntary practises codified by third party certifications of tropical tea plantations support soil biodiversity, and what factors explain soil arthropod abundance and richness in such certified and uncertified landscapes.We used pitfall trap data and soil samples across two seasons in large tea plantations, and small tea‐growing agroforestry farms in the Darjeeling Himalayas in India. Plantations certified and those not certified were selected for the study.Soil arthropod morphospecies abundance, richness and diversity were significantly higher in summer as opposed to winter. Contrary to our expectations, there was no significant difference in soil arthropod abundance, richness and diversity between uncertified small agroforestry farms and certified large monoculture plantations. Our analysis establishes tree species richness and season as the most important predictors of soil arthropod abundance, richness and effective number of species.We recommend that increased abundance and diversity of native trees in the tea matrix should be a crucial criterion for agroecosystem management. This would improve matrix functionality for species that are sensitive to management and reflect practises that enhance biodiversity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call