Abstract

There is little published information on effects of management on the structure of mixed species forests in Queensland, Australia. We used long-term growth, abundance and dimension data from permanent plots to test the hypothesis that harvesting would reduce numbers of large trees and growth increments, while increasing recruitment. This hypothesis is key to policy and management decisions for forests covering about 9.5 million hectares. Inclusion of data on changes in forest structure (e.g., tree diameter, stem density) helps in assessment of forest suitability as habitat for a range of species. Growth rate (basal area) varied widely among forest types. Growth of each of four key species (i.e., Eucalyptus pilularis, Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata, Callitris glaucophylla, and Eucalyptus crebra) reflected variation in rainfall across the study region. Callitris glaucophylla, a native conifer, is dominant when rainfall is < 600 mm per year. Corymbia citriodora ssp. variegata grows across much wider ranges in rainfall (600–1,200 mm year–1) at rates similar to Callitris glaucophylla. Historic harvesting increased recruitment and also increased the symmetry of diameter distributions. Harvesting has not reduced the current density of larger trees (diameter at breast height, DBH ≥ 60 cm) at a regional scale. Stand growth was unaffected by management principally owing to an increase in the density of trees of smaller diameter (10–20 cm DBH). Self-thinning limits potential stocking and we tested 3 methods for predicting self-thinning across forest types. We found that the slope of self-thinning lines under drier conditions is mostly < –2, suggesting highly dynamic self-thinning. Using a species-boundary line approach, growth is predicted to slow when basal areas reach around 66.1 m2 ha–1 in E. pilularis, 19.0 m2 ha–1 in C. citriodora ssp. variegata, 16.5 m2 ha–1 in Callitris glaucophylla, and 14.2 m2 ha–1 in E. crebra. The slope of the self-thinning line for E. pilularis was –1.662, similar to Reineke’s Stand Density Index (slope –1.605). To date, there is little evidence that selective harvesting and thinning have had negative impacts on rates of growth, on timber production, carbon sequestration or on aspects of forest structure regarded as important for biodiversity.

Highlights

  • The latest data show that naturally-regenerating forests represent 93% of the world’s forest cover (FAO and UNEP, 2020)

  • Eucalyptus pilularis is a dominant tree near the coast, where rainfall exceeds 1,200 mm per year

  • Callitris glaucophylla is increasingly dominant as annual rainfall declines from 700 mm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The latest data show that naturally-regenerating forests represent 93% of the world’s forest cover (FAO and UNEP, 2020). Fire-adapted native “eucalypt” forests—dominated by trees in the genera Eucalyptus, Corymbia and Angophora—are the most widespread forest type in Australia (Montreal Process Implementation Group for Australia and National Forest Inventory Steering Committe, 2018), with Queensland providing almost 40% of the Australian forest estate of approximately 131 million hectares. Much of the change is driven by changes in policy, by disturbance, and by localized intensification of use (Houghton and Hackler, 2003; USDA Forest Service, 2014; Forest Europe, 2015; Montreal Process Implementation Group for Australia and National Forest Inventory Steering Committe, 2018). Queensland native forests present a useful and informative case study of harvesting effects in native forests

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call