Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article aims to explain how during the 2014 Colombian legislative election those candidates who had national visibility—in terms of the number of appearances in written press—effectively had a nationalized election. Furthermore, it aims to explain and further the understanding of the relationship between a candidate’s reputation in terms of favorability, esteem, and prestige, and the degree of nationalization of his or her votes. Therefore, to answer our research question, a descriptive study is conducted, seeking to account for the relationship between the variables: nationalization using Bochsler’s weighted party nationalization score, candidates’ visibility in the written press, and candidates’ reputation—understood in terms of their image, esteem, prestige, and goodwill—during the 2014 election campaign.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.