NANETS Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumor

1993). The initial management of NET comprises surgical excision of the primary tumour (aimed at reducing as much as possible of the tumour mass); additionally, in patients who are not cured by surgery alone, medical therapy is used for the control of symptoms and humoral syndromes with agents such as somatostatin analogues and/or a-interferon. Specific therapy with radiopharmaceuticals using radio-labelled substances such as meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) or somatostatin analogues appears promising for some tumours which show diagnostic uptake, and is the first-line systemic management for sensitive cases. Hepatic artery ligation and/or chemoembolization is also used in patients with excessive hepatic tumour load and uncontrollable symptoms. The control of tumour growth with chemotherapeutic agents is currently mainly reserved for patients with recurrent and/or progressive disease and where other therapeutic modalities have failed. Chemotherapy may be particularly helpful for selected cases of advanced NET, especially pancreatic or poorly differentiated NET. This review deals with the general role of chemotherapy in the management of malignant NET, its integration with other modes of therapy, and the specific protocols which have been used. Histological classification and differentiation of NET

Neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors: ESMO Clinical Recommendation for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

Update on the Management of Neuroendocrine Hepatic Metastases

Biochemical Responses in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Trials

Chromogranin A (CgA) is gaining acceptance as a serum marker of neuroendocrine tumors. Its specificity in differentiating between neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine tumors, its sensitivity to detect small tumors, and its clinical value, compared with other neuroendocrine markers, have not clearly been defined, however. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical usefulness of CgA as neuroendocrine serum marker. Serum levels of CgA, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and the alpha-subunit of glycoprotein hormones (alpha-SU) were determined in 211 patients with neuroendocrine tumors and 180 control subjects with nonendocrine tumors. The concentrations of CgA, NSE, and alpha-SU were elevated in 50%, 43%, and 24% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors, respectively. Serum CgA was most frequently increased in subjects with gastrinomas (100%), pheochromocytomas (89%), carcinoid tumors (80%), nonfunctioning tumors of the endocrine pancreas (69%), and medullary thyroid carcinomas (50%). The highest levels were observed in subjects with carcinoid tumors. NSE was most frequently elevated in patients with small cell lung carcinoma (74%), and alpha-SU was most frequently elevated in patients with carcinoid tumors (39%). Most subjects with elevated alpha-SU levels also had elevated CgA concentrations. A significant positive relationship was demonstrated between the tumor load and serum CgA levels (P < 0.01, by chi 2 test). Elevated concentrations of CgA, NSE, and alpha-SU were present in, respectively, 7%, 35%, and 15% of control subjects. Markedly elevated serum levels of CgA, exceeding 300 micrograms/L, were observed in only 2% of control patients (n = 3) compared to 40% of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (n = 76). We conclude that CgA is the best general neuroendocrine serum marker available. It has the highest specificity for the detection of neuroendocrine tumors compared to the other neuroendocrine markers, NSE and alpha-SU. Elevated levels are strongly correlated with tumor volume; therefore, small tumors may go undetected. Although its specificity cannot compete with that of the specific hormonal secretion products of most neuroendocrine tumors, it can have useful clinical applications in subjects with neuroendocrine tumors for whom either no marker is available or the marker is inconvenient for routine clinical use.

Insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has recently emerged as a reliable nuclear immunostaining marker for detecting neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in paraffin-embedded surgical samples and cytologic cell blocks, but the reliability of INSM1 staining on cytologic smears is understudied. This study investigated the performance of INSM1 staining on cytologic smears for the detection of various NETs in comparison with chromogranin (CG) and synaptophysin (SYN). INSM1, CG, and SYN were stained on cytologic smears of 70 NETs, including 20 pancreatic NETs, 10 lung carcinoid tumors, 11 small cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs), 10 medullary thyroid carcinomas, 10 Merkel cell carcinomas, 4 thymic atypical carcinoid tumors, and 5 olfactory neuroblastomas. The detection rate, the percentage of positive cells, and the staining intensity were recorded. The overall detection rate of INSM1 (94%) was higher than the rates of CG (79%) and SYN (89%). The detection rate of INSM1 was higher than the rates of CG and SYN in SCLC, Merkel cell carcinoma, and olfactory neuroblastoma; higher than the rate of CG and equal to the rate of SYN in pancreatic NETs and medullary thyroid carcinoma; equal to the rate of CG and higher than the rate of SYN in thymic atypical carcinoid tumors; and equal to the rate of CG and lower than the rate of SYN in lung carcinoid tumors. INSM1 staining was easier to interpret than CG and SYN staining, especially in high-grade NETs. INSM1 can be reliably stained on cytologic smears and outperforms CG and SYN in the verification of clinically or radiologically suspected NETs.

To review the available literature addressing the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) and carcinoid tumors. Relevant literature was identified by a PubMed search (January 1977-December 2011) of English-language literature using the terms gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, pancreatic neuroendocrine, carcinoid, and pancreatic islet cell tumor. All published studies and abstracts, as well as relevant consensus guidelines, evaluating the current literature about PNETs and carcinoid tumors were included. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are a genetically diverse group of complex malignancies with varying biological and clinical courses. Historically believed to be rare, recent epidemiologic data suggest their incidence is rising. Two of the most commonly diagnosed GEP-NETs are PNETs and carcinoid tumors. Both subtypes are well-differentiated tumors and present as low or intermediate grade. The systemic manifestations of PNETs and carcinoid tumors are diverse and are related to the secretion of affected hormones and biogenic amines. Surgical resection of localized disease remains the only curative option. However, the utility of this approach is limited because most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Recent advances have led to an improvement in outcomes in patients with PNETs and carcinoid tumors. This review describes traditional therapies as well as emerging strategies being investigated to help manage these cancers. Treatment of poorly differentiated GEP-NETs is beyond the scope of this review. The advent of new therapies for PNETs and carcinoid tumors has introduced a paradigm shift in the management of this heterogeneous malignancy.

Chromogranin A as a determinant of midgut carcinoid tumour volume

To evaluate the significance of serum chromogranin A (CgA) status in patients with and without different neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) by conducting a retrospective assessment of the diagnostic utility and limitations of CgA as a biomarker for NETs in a tertiary care hospital in Oman. We conducted a retrospective analysis of CgA requests referred to the Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Royal Hospital, Oman over a 24-month period (April 2012 to March 2014). During this time, 302 CgA tests for 270 patients (119 males and 151 females; age range 11-86 years and mean±standard deviation (SD) 44.0±18.0 years), were requested. Of these CgA tests, 245 tests were performed for 245 patients investigated for the diagnosis of NETs, and 57 CgA tests were performed for 25 patients with diagnosed NETs who were undergoing follow-up. Serum CgA levels were analyzed using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a cut-off value of 22 IU/L. Of the 302 CgA tests reviewed, 197 (65.2%) were within the quoted normal range; however, 105 (34.8%) had CgA > 22 IU/L. Of the 245 patients with first-line CgA, 38 patients (15.5%) had NET that included carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, pancreatic NET, adrenal adenoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal NET, medullary thyroid carcinoma, Schwannoma, lung small cell carcinoma, parathyroid adenoma, and pituitary macroadenoma. The mean±SD of CgA in these patients with NETs was 205.0±172.0 IU/L. Meanwhile, there were 45 (18.3%) patients with CgA > 22 IU/L (83.0±116.0 IU/L) who did not have NETs. The conditions/diseases included: essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, peptic ulcer, chronic diarrhea, use of proton pump inhibitors, and other chronic diseases (hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes mellitus). Of the 25 patients with known NET who were followed-up, there were 57 CgA results (29 with CgA ≤ 22 IU/L and 28 with CgA > 22 IU/L). The overall clinical sensitivity of CgA in the diagnosis of NETs was 84.2%, overall specificity was 78.2%, positive predictive value was 41.5%, negative predictive value was 96.4%, and overall efficiency was 79.2%. In patients with individual NET, a good reflection in CgA was noticed in the follow-up period following surgery or therapy. Serum CgA is a sensitive and effective noninvasive laboratory test for the clinical detection and management of NETs. Awareness of the pitfalls of the tests in patients with non-NET conditions, particularly chronic diseases and use of certain drugs, is important to be considered during the interpretation of the CgA levels.

Chromogranin A (CgA) is the best established neuroendocrine biomarker. This study was aimed at investigating the prognostic value of CgA as a predictor of radiological disease progression in neuroendocrine tumour (NET) patients. Patients with metastatic NETs and evidence of radiological progression (RP) according to RECIST 1.1 were identified from a NET database. Plasma CgA levels were measured 6 and 12 months before RP and at the event of RP. CgA was measured with the Supra-regional-Assay-Service radioimmunoassay (Hammersmith Hospital). A total of 152 patients were evaluated including 91 midgut NETs and 61 pancreatic NETs (PNETs). Of these, 56 were G1 NETs, 65 G2, 10 G3, 21 of unknown histology. For all NETs, there was a positive trend in terms of increase of CgA values 6 months prior to RP compared to 12 months before RP. Subgroup analysis at first episode of RP showed that for PNETs there was evidence of a difference in the median CgA levels. CgA 6 months before RP was 100 pmol/L [interquartile 1 (Q1) =53 and Q3 =286.25 pmol/L) and 12 months before was 52 pmol/L (Q1 =36.25 and Q3 =128 pmol/L), W=52, P=0.48. This observation was not confirmed in midgut NETs, where median CgA 6 months before RP was 389.5 pmol/L (Q1 =131.5 and Q3 =791.5 pmol/L) and 12 months before was 319 pmol/L (Q1 =158 and Q3 =753 pmol/L), W=191, P=0.39]. Low grade tumours (G1) had a median CgA value at 6 months significantly higher than at 12 months [181 (Q1 =56.25, Q3 =624) vs. 149.5 (Q1 =44, Q3 =247.25) pmol/L, W=70, P=0.48]. CgA seems to have predictive value 6 months prior to RP for PNETs and G1 tumours. Further prospective analyses are needed to enable more definitive conclusions.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma chromogranin A (CgA) in patients diagnosed with early-stage pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in terms of diagnostic value and treatment response. A total of 35 patients with PNETs were prospectively enrolled from August 2010 to April 2014. Demographic and clinicopathological data were collected, and serial plasma CgA levels were measured. Tumor responses were defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria. Pearson's χ2 test was used for the analysis of the association between the plasma CgA level and various factors. Plasma CgA level was significantly associated with the size (P=0.03), metastasis (P=0.02) and tumor stage (P=0.03) of the PNETs. Using 126 U/l as the optimal cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity were 87.5 and 81.5%, respectively. For localized tumors, the sensitivity of CgA for diagnosing PNETs was relatively low, even following a lowering of the cutoff values (29.6–51.9%). Plasma CgA level was correlated with therapeutic response in those patients with high baseline CgA levels (P=0.025), but not in the patients with low baseline CgA levels (P=0.587). In conclusion, plasma CgA level was associated with tumor size, metastasis and tumor stage in patients with PNET. For early-stage PNETs, CgA exhibited a limited role in diagnosis and treatment response evaluation in the population of the present study.

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are increasing in both incidence and prevalence. A delay in correct diagnosis is common for these lesions. This reflects the absence of specific blood biomarkers to detect NENs. Measurement of the neuroendocrine secretory peptide Chromogranin A (CgA) is used, but is a single value, is non-specific and assay data are highly variable. To facilitate tumor detection, we developed a multi-transcript molecular signature for PCR-based blood analysis. NEN transcripts were identified by computational analysis of 3 microarray datasets: NEN tissue (n = 15), NEN peripheral blood (n = 7), and adenocarcinoma (n = 363 tumors). The candidate gene signature was examined in 130 blood samples (NENs: n = 63) and validated in two independent sets (Set 1 [n = 115, NENs: n = 72]; Set 2 [n = 120, NENs: n = 58]). Comparison with CgA (ELISA) was undertaken in 176 samples (NENs: n = 81). 51 significantly elevated transcript markers were identified. Gene-based classifiers detected NENs in independent sets with high sensitivity (85–98%), specificity (93–97%), PPV (95–96%) and NPV (87–98%). The AUC for the NEN gene-based classifiers was 0.95–0.98 compared to 0.64 for CgA (Z-statistic 6.97–11.42, p<0.0001). Overall, the gene-based classifier was significantly (χ2 = 12.3, p<0.0005) more accurate than CgA. In a sub-analysis, pancreatic NENs and gastrointestinal NENs could be identified with similar efficacy (79–88% sensitivity, 94% specificity), as could metastases (85%). In patients with low CgA, 91% exhibited elevated transcript markers. A panel of 51 marker genes differentiates NENs from controls with a high PPV and NPV (>90%), identifies pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs with similar efficacy, and confirms GEP-NENs when CgA levels are low. The panel is significantly more accurate than the CgA assay. This reflects its utility to identify multiple diverse biological components of NENs. Application of this sensitive and specific PCR-based blood test to NENs will allow accurate detection of disease, and potentially define disease progress enabling monitoring of treatment efficacy.

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is a heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by hypersecretion of biologically active sub- stances that manifests by specific syndromes and determines the clinical course of the disease. The most common NET types are those of gastrointestinal tract. The obligatory biochemical marker used in the examination of NET patients is chromogranin A (CgA). Aim: Evaluation of the CgA value for diagnostics and monitoring of gastrointestinal NETs. Materials and methods: A comparative study of plasma CgA levels was performed in 146 patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tu- mors and 66 healthy individuals using the enzyme immunoassay “Chromogranin A ELISA kit” (Dako A/S, Denmark). Results: CgA levels were significantly higher in patients with NETs of all localizations, such as pancreas, stomach, gut, small and large bowel, than in the healthy subjects (р < 0.000001). In NET patients, CgA secretion was highly variable, with the highest value in the group of patients with gastric NETs (102000 U/l). The highest CgA medians were detected in patients with small intestinal (183.9 U/l), colon (148.4 U/l) and pancreatic (135.9 U/l) NETs. There was an association between CgA secretion and extension or activity of NETs, with the highest median values in patients with hepatic metastases (395 U/l) and those with carcinoid syndrome (352 U/l). The clinical significance of CgA as a NET marker was assessed using the cut-off value of 33 U/l, calculated according to the results in the control group. Overall diagnostic sensitivity of CgA in NET patients was high (85.8%) with a specificity of 98.5%. Conclusion: The results obtained confirm a high sensitivity of CgA as a NET marker whose determination helps to improve accuracy of diagnostics and to assess NET prevalence.

The College of American Pathologists offers these protocols to assist pathologists in providing clinically useful and relevant information when reporting results of surgical specimen examinations. The College regards the reporting elements in the "Surgical Pathology Cancer Case Summary (Checklist)" portion of the protocols as essential elements of the pathology report. However, the manner in which these elements are reported is at the discretion of each specific pathologist, taking into account clinician preferences, institutional policies, and individual practice.The College developed these protocols as an educational tool to assist pathologists in the useful reporting of relevant information. It did not issue the protocols for use in litigation, reimbursement, or other contexts. Nevertheless, the College recognizes that the protocols might be used by hospitals, attorneys, payers, and others. Indeed, effective January 1, 2004, the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons mandated the use of the checklist elements of the protocols as part of its Cancer Program Standards for Approved Cancer Programs. Therefore, it becomes even more important for pathologists to familiarize themselves with these documents. At the same time, the College cautions that use of the protocols other than for their intended educational purpose may involve additional considerations that are beyond the scope of these documents.This protocol applies to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the large bowel and rectum. Carcinomas with mixed endocrine/glandular differentiation, poorly differentiated carcinomas with neuroendocrine features, and small cell carcinomas are not included. The 7th edition TNM staging system for neuroendocrine tumors of the colon of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) is recommended.Colon and Rectum: Resection, Including Transanal Disk Excision of Rectal Neoplasms (note A)Select a Single Response Unless Otherwise Indicated* Data elements with asterisks are not required. However, these elements may be clinically important but are not yet validated or regularly used in patient management.Specimen (select all that apply)Procedure*Specimen Size (applicable to transanal disk excision)Tumor Site (select all that apply) (note B)Tumor Size (note C)Tumor FocalityHistologic Type (note D)*Alternative Histologic Classification (note E)*Histologic Grade (note E)aa For poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) checklist for carcinoma of the colon and rectum1 should be used.Mitotic RateMicroscopic Tumor ExtensionMarginsProximal MarginDistal MarginCircumferential (Radial) Margin (note F)Other Margin(s) (specify): ____________________________If all margins uninvolved by neuroendocrine tumor:Lymph-Vascular Invasion*Perineural InvasionPathologic Staging (pTNM) (note G)TNM Descriptors (required only if applicable) (select all that apply)Primary Tumor (pT)Regional Lymph Nodes (pN)Distant Metastasis (pM)*Ancillary Studies (select all that apply) (notes E and H)*Additional Pathologic Findings (select all that apply) (note I)*Comment(s): ______________________________________This protocol applies to low- and intermediate-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (carcinoid tumors) of the colon and rectum. Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, small cell carcinomas, and tumors with mixed glandular/neuroendocrine differentiation are not included.Because of site-specific similarities in histology, immunohistochemistry, and histochemistry, neuroendocrine tumors of the digestive tract have traditionally been subdivided into those of foregut, midgut, and hindgut origin (Table). In general, the distribution pattern along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract parallels that of the progenitor cell type, and the anatomic site of origin of GI neuroendocrine tumors is an important predictor of clinical behavior.2Rectal neuroendocrine tumors are common and constitute approximately a quarter of GI neuroendocrine tumors.3 They are usually small, solitary, and clinically silent, most commonly occurring 4 to 13 cm from the anal verge. Mitotically inactive rectal neuroendocrine tumors or those smaller than 2.0 cm are almost always clinically benign.4 Metastases and carcinoid syndrome are very rare. Large intestinal neuroendocrine tumors outside the ileocecal region and rectum are extremely rare; most reported tumors have been large (average size, 5.0 cm) and high grade, with a poor prognosis. Many low-grade neuroendocrine tumors involving the ileocecal valve represent tumors arising in the terminal ileum rather than in the large bowel.For neuroendocrine tumors in any part of the gastrointestinal tract, size greater than 2.0 cm is associated with a higher risk of lymph node metastasis. Rectal carcinoids smaller than 1.0 cm are almost always clinically benign, and local excision is generally considered sufficient for tumors 1.0 cm or smaller, as well as many tumors between 1.0 and 2.0 cm. More extensive procedures (eg, right hemicolectomy and abdominoperineal resection) are usually reserved for patients with tumors larger than 2.0 cm.The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies neuroendocrine neoplasms as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.5–8 Historically, well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms have been referred to as carcinoid tumors, a term which may cause confusion because clinically a carcinoid tumor is a serotonin-producing tumor associated with functional manifestations of carcinoid syndrome.Classification of neuroendocrine tumors is based upon size, functionality, site, and invasion. Functioning tumors are those associated with clinical manifestations of hormone production or secretion of measurable amounts of active hormone; immunohistochemical demonstration of hormone production is not equivalent to clinically apparent functionality.All colonic neuroendocrine tumors are considered potentially malignant; none are classified as benign or low-malignant-potential neuroendocrine tumors. Most are large, bulky, high grade, highly invasive tumors that are metastatic at presentation. Two-thirds arise within the cecum or right colon.Rectal neuroendocrine tumors, in contrast to colonic neuroendocrine tumors, are relatively common and generally behave in a benign fashion.Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine TumorNonfunctioning cytologically bland tumors confined to mucosa or submucosa, with no angioinvasion, and measuring not more than 2 cm in greatest dimension.Nonfunctioning cytologically bland tumors confined to mucosa or submucosa, with angioinvasion, less than 2 cm in size.Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine CarcinomaNonfunctioning tumors that are larger than 2 cm, or invade the muscularis propria or beyond, or are metastatic. Functional tumors associated with carcinoid syndrome are included in this category.Histologic PatternsAlthough specific histologic patterns in well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms, such as trabecular, insular, and glandular, roughly correlate with tumor location,4 these patterns have not been clearly shown independently to predict response to therapy or risk of nodal metastasis and are rarely reported in clinical practice.Cytologic atypia in low-grade neuroendocrine tumors has no impact on clinical behavior of these tumors. However, a grading system based on mitotic activity has been proposed for neuroendocrine tumors of the ileum, appendix, colon, and rectum9:G1 and G2 are well-differentiated tumors with diffuse intense chromogranin/synaptophysin positivity. Punctate necrosis is more typical of G2 tumors. G3 tumors are high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (the CAP checklist for carcinomas of the colon and rectum1 should be used for poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas arising in these sites).In addition to addressing the proximal and distal margins, assessment of the circumferential (radial) margin is necessary for any segment of gastrointestinal tract, either unencased (Figure, C) or incompletely encased by peritoneum (Figure, B). The circumferential margin represents the adventitial soft-tissue margin closest to the deepest penetration of tumor and is created surgically by blunt or sharp dissection of the retroperitoneal or subperitoneal aspect, respectively. The distance between the tumor and circumferential (radial) margin should be reported. The circumferential (radial) margin is considered negative if the tumor is more than 1 mm from the inked nonperitonealized surface but should be recorded as positive if the tumor is located 1 mm or less from the nonperitonealized surface. This assessment includes tumor within a lymph node as well as direct tumor extension, but if circumferential (radial) margin positivity is based solely on intranodal tumor, this should be so stated.The mesenteric resection margin is the only relevant circumferential margin in segments completely encased by peritoneum (eg, transverse colon) (Figure, A). Involvement of this margin should be reported even if tumor does not penetrate the serosal surface.The TNM staging system for neuroendocrine tumors of the colon and rectum of the AJCC and the UICC is recommended.11By AJCC/UICC convention, the designation "T" refers to a primary tumor that has not been previously treated. The symbol "p" refers to the pathologic classification of the TNM, as opposed to the clinical classification, and is based on gross and microscopic examination. pT entails a resection of the primary tumor or biopsy adequate to evaluate the highest pT category, pN entails removal of nodes adequate to validate lymph node metastasis, and pM implies microscopic examination of distant lesions. Clinical classification (cTNM) is usually carried out by the referring physician before treatment, during initial evaluation of the patient or when pathologic classification is not possible.Pathologic staging is usually performed after surgical resection of the primary tumor. Pathologic staging depends on pathologic documentation of the anatomic extent of disease, whether or not the primary tumor has been completely removed. If a biopsied tumor is not resected for any reason (eg, when technically unfeasible) and if the highest T and N categories or the M1 category of the tumor can be confirmed microscopically, the criteria for pathologic classification and staging have been satisfied without total removal of the primary cancer.For identification of special cases of TNM or pTNM classifications, the "m" suffix and "y," "r," and "a" prefixes are used. Although they do not affect the stage grouping, they indicate cases needing separate analysis.The "m" suffix indicates the presence of multiple primary tumors in a single site and is recorded in parentheses: pT(m)NM.The "y" prefix indicates those cases in which classification is performed during or after initial multimodality therapy (ie, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both chemotherapy and radiation therapy). The cTNM or pTNM category is identified by a "y" prefix. The ycTNM or ypTNM categorizes the extent of tumor actually present at the time of that examination. The "y" categorization is not an estimate of tumor before multimodality therapy (ie, before initiation of neoadjuvant therapy).The "r" prefix indicates a recurrent tumor when staged after a documented disease-free interval and is identified by the "r" prefix: rTNM.The "a" prefix designates the stage determined at autopsy: aTNM.The regional lymph nodes of the colon and rectum are as follows.Immunohistochemistry and other ancillary techniques are generally not required to diagnose well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Specific markers that may be used to establish neuroendocrine differentiation include chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, synaptophysin, and CD56.7 Because of their relative sensitivity and specificity, chromogranin A and synaptophysin are recommended. It should be noted that hindgut neuroendocrine tumors often do not express appreciable amounts of chromogranin A. Rectal neuroendocrine tumors express prostatic acid phosphatase, a potential diagnostic pitfall for tumors arising in male patients.12Immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 may be useful in establishing tumor grade (note E) and prognosis12 but is not currently considered standard of care.7Immunohistochemistry for specific hormone products, such as glucagon, gastrin, and somatostatin, may be of interest in some cases. However, immunohistochemical demonstration of hormone production does not equate with clinical functionality of the tumor.Coagulative tumor necrosis, usually punctate, may indicate more aggressive behavior10 and should be reported.The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2022 Guidance Paper for Carcinoid Syndrome and Carcinoid Heart Disease