Abstract
A quantitative PCR procedure using a newly designed primer set for amplification of human specific DNA sequence D17Z1 for quantification of human DNA has been developed. The procedure was compared with the existing quantification method, UV absorption method and slot blot hybridization method. The lower limit of quantification, the reproducibility of results, quantification of degraded DNA, quantification specificity and application for forensic casework samples were examined using each technique. The quantitative PCR method consumed the least amount of DNA and could quantify as little as 0.0015 ng of DNA, and its reproducibility was comparable with the UV absorption method. The STR typing of degraded DNA samples quantified by slot blot hybridization method and quantitative PCR method were properly detected and typed. Since the bacterial DNA samples were not detected and quantified by slot blot hybridization method and quantitative PCR method, they are useful for human-specific DNA quantification of forensic evidence samples containing bacterial DNA. In the experimental application of the quantitative PCR method for various forensic casework samples, almost every STR loci were properly detected and it demonstrated a beneficial effect for actual forensic identification analysis. Furthermore, the quantitative PCR method was also useful in determining the proper amount of template DNA extracted from the sample suspected to include amplification inhibitor. In the results of the comparisons, the human specific DNA quantification using the technique of quantitative PCR is more practical for forensic DNA analysis than the other methods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Japanese Journal of Forensic Science and Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.