Mycophenolate Mofetil, an Inhibitor of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase, and Tofacitinib, a Janus Kinase Inhibitor, Attenuate Airway Inflammation and Hyperresponsiveness in a Mouse Model of Allergic Asthma

Abstract

Treatment-resistant asthma remains an unresolved clinical problem and a challenge for current medical science. Consequently, there is a growing and urgent need to develop novel or alternative therapeutic options for the treatment of asthma. The research problem raised in this study was to assess and compare mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, and tofacitinib (TFB), a Janus kinase inhibitor, for anti-asthmatic properties, and consequently to determine whether these agents may have potential as alternative options for treatment of allergic asthma. For this purpose, we assessed the effect of administration of MMF and TFB on the development of a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation (AAI) and accompanying CD4+ (cluster of differentiation 4) T-cell immune response in the lung-draining mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and lungs, i.e., in the inductive and effector sites, respectively, of the immune response underlying the development of allergic asthma. The results from a histopathological scoring system demonstrated that the administration of MMF and TFB did not prevent or abolish ovalbumin-induced AAI, but strongly attenuated its severity. The pulmonary function tests revealed that the treatment with MMF and TFB significantly reduced methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. These results indicate that the treatment with TFB and MMF attenuated the development of ovalbumin-induced AAI. The magnitude of the anti-asthmatic effect was comparable between both agents. The study revealed that the impairment of the clonal expansion of effector CD4+ T cells in the MLNs is a critical event in the mechanism underlying the anti-asthmatic effect of MMF and TFB. Apart from this, the findings of the study strongly suggest that the suppression of the interleukin-33/suppression of tumorigenicity-2 signaling pathway may constitute an additional mechanism responsible for producing this effect. In turn, the results indicate that the anti-asthmatic action induced by the studied agents is not mediated by the generation of forkhead box protein 3-expressing CD4+ regulatory T cells. Clinical implication of the results: the results suggest that MMF and TFB may exert anti-asthmatic action, and thus they may be considered therapeutic options for the treatment of allergic asthma cases resistant to conventional/existing treatment.