Abstract

Syntactic violations in speech and music have been shown to elicit an anterior negativity (AN) as early as 100 ms after violation onset and a posterior positivity that peaks at roughly 600 ms (P600/LPC). The language AN is typically reported as left-lateralized (LAN), whereas the music AN is typically reported as right-lateralized (RAN). However, several lines of evidence suggest syntactic processing of language and music rely on overlapping neural systems. The current study tested the hypothesis that syntactic processing of speech and music share neural resources by examining whether musical proficiency modulates ERP indices of linguistic syntactic processing. ERPs were measured in response to syntactic violations in sentences and chord progressions in musicians and non-musicians. Violations in speech were insertion errors in normal and semantically impoverished English sentences. Violations in music were out-of-key chord substitutions from distantly and closely related keys. Phrase-structure violations elicited an AN and P600 in both groups. Harmonic violations elicited an LPC in both groups, blatant harmonic violations also elicited a RAN in musicians only. Cross-domain effects of musical proficiency were similar to previously reported within-domain effects of linguistic proficiency on the distribution of the language AN; syntactic violations in normal English sentences elicited a LAN in musicians and a bilateral AN in non-musicians. The late positivities elicited by violations differed in latency and distribution between domains. These results suggest that initial processing of syntactic violations in language and music relies on shared neural resources in the general population, and that musical expertise results in more specialized cortical organization of syntactic processing in both domains.

Highlights

  • Measuring the effects of expertise in one domain on processing in another domain provides a way to define shared neural resources

  • These results suggest that initial processing of syntactic violations in language and music relies on shared neural resources in the general population, and that musical expertise results in more specialized cortical organization of syntactic processing in both domains

  • Differences in the extent to which the anterior negativity (AN) extended to the most lateral sites cannot be attributed to differences in P600 amplitude that might overlap with the AN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measuring the effects of expertise in one domain on processing in another domain provides a way to define shared neural resources. The Western tonal musical system contains rules regarding the temporal arrangement and stress patterning of musical events (Lerdahl and Jackendoff, 1983), as well as the arrangement of pitches in monophonic (melody) and polyphonic (harmony) phrases (Krumhansl and Shepard, 1979; Krumhansl and Kessler, 1982; Bharucha and Krumhansl, 1983) Together these rules can be considered the grammar of Western music, and they are applied in a hierarchical and interactive fashion to a limited number of base musical units to form an effectively unlimited set of expressions (Lerdahl and Jackendoff, 1983)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call