Abstract
Section 92 of the Maldives Penal Code (9/2014) reserves the capital penalty for the most serious homicides, and the law tries to reduce the imposition of capital punishment by rigidifying the procedural requirement. However, the case law demonstrates the opposite effect. This article seeks to advance therapeutic values of procedures and promote less severe punishments in murder cases by utilising knowledge from therapeutic jurisprudence and sharia. To validate the research claim, three randomly selected cases were examined. According to the findings, current court practises in murder cases do not promote therapeutic values or result in less severe punishment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
