Abstract

The discrepancy between the Standard Model theory and experimental measurement of the muon magnetic moment anomaly, $a_{\mu}=\left(g_{\mu}-2\right)/2$, is connected to precision electroweak (EW) predictions via their common dependence on hadronic vacuum polarization effects. The same data for the total $e^+e^- \rightarrow \text{hadrons}$ cross section, $\sigma_{\rm had}(s)$, are used as input into dispersion relations to estimate the hadronic vacuum polarization contributions, $a_{\mu}^{\rm had,\,VP}$, as well as the five-flavor hadronic contribution to the running QED coupling at the $Z$-pole, $\Delta\alpha_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2)$, which enters natural relations and global EW fits. The EW fit prediction of $\Delta\alpha_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2) = 0.02722(41)$ agrees well with $\Delta\alpha_{\rm had}^{(5)}(M_{Z}^2) = 0.02761(11)$ obtained from the dispersion relation approach, but exhibits a smaller central value suggestive of a larger discrepancy $\Delta a_{\mu}=a_{\mu}^{\rm exp} - a_{\mu}^{\rm SM}$ than currently expected. Postulating that the $\Delta a_{\mu}$ difference may be due to missing $\sigma_{\rm had}(s)$ contributions, implications for $M_W$, $\sin^2 \! \theta^{\rm lep}_{\rm eff}$ and $M_H$ obtained from global EW fits are investigated. Shifts in $\sigma_{\rm had}(s)$ needed to bridge $\Delta a_{\mu}$ are found to be excluded above $\sqrt{s} \gtrsim 0.7$ GeV at the 95\%CL. Moreover, prospects for $\Delta a_{\mu}$ originating below that energy are deemed improbable given the required increases in the cross section. Such hypothetical changes to the hadronic data are also found to affect other related observables, such as the electron anomaly, $a_e^{\rm SM}$, the ratio $R_{e/\mu} = (m_\mu/m_e)^2 (a_{e}^{\rm had,\,LO\,VP}/a_{\mu}^{\rm had,\,LO\,VP})$ and the running of the weak mixing angle at low energies, although the consequences of these are currently less constraining.

Highlights

  • The muon magnetic moment anomaly, aμ 1⁄4 ðg − 2Þ=2, exhibits a long-standing discrepancy between the Standard Model (SM) prediction [1] and the experimentally measured value [2,3,4,5]

  • Coupled with the estimate of the next-to-nextto-leading-order (NNLO) contribution, ahμad;NNLO vacuum polarization (VP) 1⁄4 1.24ð1Þ × 10−10 [24], the total hadronic VP contribution to aμ is estimated to be ahμad;VP1⁄2KNT19Š 1⁄4 684.19ð2.38Þ× 10−10. These updates yielded aSμM1⁄2KNT19Š1⁄4ð11659181.1Æ 3.8Þ×10−10 and Δaμ1⁄2KNT19Š 1⁄4 ð28.0 Æ 7.4Þ × 10−10 [23], which are entirely consistent with the corresponding values presented in [1] and form the basis of the results presented in this paper

  • This work investigates the possibility of such a claim and, focuses on the effect on the predicted values of MW, sin2 θleefpf, and MH when the hadronic cross section data are adjusted to account for the muon g − 2 discrepancy

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The muon magnetic moment anomaly, aμ 1⁄4 ðg − 2Þ=2, exhibits a long-standing discrepancy between the Standard Model (SM) prediction [1] and the experimentally measured value [2,3,4,5]. This work investigates the possibility of such a claim and, focuses on the effect on the predicted values of MW, sin θleefpf , and MH when the hadronic cross section data are adjusted to account for the muon g − 2 discrepancy As part of this analysis, the implications for other observables connected via the hadronic vacuum polarization sector are of interest. The BMW Collaboration presented the first LQCD determination of ahμad;LO VP with subpercent (0.6%) precision [85] This impressive result, ahμad;LO VP1⁄2BMWŠ 1⁄4 712.4ð4.5Þ × 10−10, leads to a value for aSμM that is in good agreement with Eq (1.1), eliminating the muon g − 2 discrepancy and indicating a no-new-physics scenario.

Methodology summary and updates
Updates to σhadðsÞ
Updates to EW precision measurements and their global fit
Prediction of Δαðh5aÞdðM2ZÞ from the EW fit and consequences for aμ
The weak mixing angle at low energies
Findings
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.