Abstract

Complementary surface analysis techniques—X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS), time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR)—were combined to characterize the structure and composition of DNA-modified surfaces. Both model systems [thiolated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) on gold surfaces] and commercial systems (ssDNA spotted onto microarray slides) were investigated. Pure thiolated 20-mer ssDNA assembles onto gold, with the ssDNA binding spontaneously to the surface via the thiol groups and nitrogen atoms in the DNA bases, resulting in a monolayer with limited ssDNA chain order. XPS, NEXAFS, SPR, and radiotracer studies showed that when the pure ssDNA monolayers were exposed to short-chain functionalized alkyl thiol diluents [either 11-mercapto-1-undecanol (MCU) or oligo(ethylene glycol) (OEG)], the diluents initially displaced the weaker gold–nitrogen DNA interactions, reorienting the ssDNA chains to a more upright configuration. After longer exposures to diluent thiols, some ssDNA chains were displaced from the gold surface. The efficiency of the target hybridization to complementary DNA from solution depended on the structure and composition of the immobilized probe ssDNA surface. As the upright orientation of the ssDNA chains increased, the amount of hybridization increased. As ssDNA chains were displaced from the surface, the amount of hybridization decreased. Incorporating the diluent thiol eliminated the small amount of nonspecific binding from noncomplementary target DNA observed on the pure ssDNA monolayers. The DNA hybridization kinetics were significantly more rapid on the mixed ssDNA/MCU and ssDNA/OEG surfaces compared to the pure ssDNA surface. The OEG diluent was more effective than the MCU diluent at reducing nonspecific protein adsorption during DNA hybridization from blood serum. Nanoliter drops of amine-terminated ssDNA were robotically spotted onto a glass microscope slide with an amine-reactive microarray polymer coating; the resulting 150-μm spots were imaged with XPS and ToF-SIMS. Imaging XPS provided single-spot phosphorous, nitrogen, sodium, and silicon elemental images. Small-spot XPS data were then used to quantify DNA hybridization efficiencies in each microspot as a function of the ssDNA concentration in the probe printing solution. The DNA microspots were also readily visualized in the negative ToF-SIMS images of key fragments from the DNA backbone (e.g., PO x ), DNA bases (A–H, T–H, G–H, C–H, etc.), and the substrate (e.g., Si). Principal component analysis (PCA) of the ToF-SIMS images was used to distinguish heterogeneities within the DNA microspots due to the variations in printing process and solution additives (salts, sodium dodecyl sulfate, etc.). The different types of data available from combining these complementary surface analytical methods provide new information essential to understanding aspects of DNA on surfaces. Such information is important for designing and improving new technologies that employ nucleic acids on surfaces, including bioassays, diagnostics, molecular computing, self-assembling materials, and miniaturized separations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call