Abstract

Objective: To determine turbidity removal efficiency of raw water samples, by using Multi-Stage Filtration technology and complemented with natural coagulants. Methods/Analysis: Water samples were taken from the Sinu River. A pilot plant was set up in laboratory, and treatability tests were carried out on samples with different scenarios. Findings: The best treatment for raw water was obtained when 240 m3 m-2d-1 rates were applied for 200 NTU initial turbidity. There were no alterations in pH and water alkalinity after treatability tests. Application: This raw water treatment technology is very useful and appropriate to be applied in rural areas with difficult access and scarce economic resources, since its simplicity does not require costly inputs or maintenance. Keywords: Activated Carbon, Moringa oleifera, Multi-Stage Filtration, Natural Coagulants, Water Treatment

Highlights

  • Quality Risk Index of Water -IRCA1 is used in Colombia as an indicator to determine water quality, based on degree of risk of diseases occurrence related to ­non-compliance with physical, chemical and ­microbiological ­characteristics of water for human c­ onsumption

  • Water samples for this study were taken from the Sinu River, from the irrigation channel located in the Mocari neighborhood, city of Monteria

  • Water alkalinity does not interfere with efficiency of natural coagulants such as extracts of Moringa oleifera seed[16]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Quality Risk Index of Water -IRCA1 is used in Colombia as an indicator to determine water quality, based on degree of risk of diseases occurrence related to ­non-compliance with physical, chemical and ­microbiological ­characteristics of water for human c­ onsumption. In the c­ ountry, large and medium urban centers receive a supply of decent quality water, without risk or minimal risk to human health and; as urban size decreases and r­urality increases; water q­uality worsens, increasing risk level[2]. In this way, in smaller municipalities and rural areas, IRCA is ­predominantly high and in some cases s­ anitarily unviable. In ­contrast, 31.25% of the departments had a ­high-risk level in the rural area[3] This situation is mainly due because in rural ­population centers infrastructure for provision of potable water and basic sanitation, is built without a t­echnical and financial analysis to allow choosing the most ­appropriate ­alternative to fit demand features. Infrastructure is neither ­operated nor used[4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.