Abstract
The paper raises a few old debates in the field of language development, such as the one between a ``free'' versus a ``monitored'' policy, treading of a ``known'' or a ``novel'' path of progression, or the cost and consequences of a decision to develop a writing system, or the sociopolitical factors that may contribute to such multilinguality or multiscriptality. It suggests that so far wrong questions have been raised, viz. whether one is talking about a language or a dialect, or whether the variety of speech has a script, or, say, could it have its own grammar, etc. In raising such questions, one overlooks the fact that both in the developed western communities and in South Asia, dierent languages employ the same or similar writing systems and yet remain dierent. The study discusses a few actual cases of plurality and multiscriptality in South Asia and the problems arising out of plurality of scripts. It is argued here that in civil societies, all linguistically minority communities have the right to develop their own languages and choose or create their own writing systems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of the Sociology of Language
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.