Abstract
In this paper, we study the existence of multiple positive solutions to the following Kirchhoff equation with competing potential functions: \t\t\t{−(ε2a+εb∫R3|∇v|2)Δv+V(x)v=K(x)|v|p−1vin R3,v>0,v∈H1(R3),\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{amsmath}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{wasysym}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{amsfonts}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{amssymb}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{amsbsy}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{mathrsfs}\t\t\t\t\\usepackage{upgreek}\t\t\t\t\\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\t\t\t\t\\begin{document}$$ \\textstyle\\begin{cases} -(\\varepsilon ^{2}a+\\varepsilon b{\\int _{\\mathbb{R}^{3}}}{ \\vert \\nabla v \\vert } ^{2})\\Delta v+V(x)v=K(x) \\vert v \\vert ^{p-1}v \\quad \\mbox{in }\\mathbb{R}^{3}, \\\\ v>0, \\quad v\\in H^{1}(\\mathbb{R}^{3}), \\end{cases} $$\\end{document} where varepsilon >0 is a small parameter, a,b>0 are constants, 3< p<5. We relate the number of solutions with the topology of the global minima set of the function {V^{frac{2}{p-1}-frac{1}{2}}(x)}/ {K^{frac{2}{p-1}}(x)}. The Nehari manifold and Ljusternik–Schnirelmann category theory are applied in our study.
Highlights
We study the existence of multiple positive solutions to the following Kirchhoff equation with competing potential functions:
1 Introduction In this paper, we study the existence of multiple positive solutions to the Kirchhoff equation with competing potential functions:
Some early classical studies of Kirchhoff equations were those by Bernstein [4] and Pohozaev [21]
Summary
We study the existence of multiple positive solutions to the Kirchhoff equation with competing potential functions:. By Lemma 3.4 of [23], we know that there exists c > 0 such that cε > cfor each ε > 0 and lim supε→0+ cε ≤ c0, where c0 is defined in Remark 1.3. From [23], we know there exists {yεk } ⊂ R3 such that εkyεk → x0 ∈ M (defined in (1.5)), and if we let wk(x) := uεk (x + yεk ), wk → w0 in H1(R3), where w0 is the unique positive ground state solution of. Lemma 3.1 For ε > 0 sufficiently small, the constrained functional Iε|Nε satisfies the (PS)c condition for c < c∞, where c∞ is defined in Remark 1.3. Letting k → ∞, η → 0 and by the continuity of cη with respect to η (see Remark 1.3), we know that c∞ ≤ c, a contradiction which concludes the proof
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.