Abstract

This paper formulates two groups of multiperiod production and ordering models with call and bidirectional option contracts for a two-party supply chain consisting of one followed supplier and one dominant retailer, respectively. Based on dynamic programming theory, we characterize the optimal policy structures for two partners in each period. We also provide an approximation for the corresponding policy parameters evaluation in two cases. Then, we investigate the impacts of different option contracts and the demand risk on the decisions and performances of two members. Our results suggest that, whether concerning call or bidirectional option contracts, the optimal policies for two members always follow a base stock type. When the price parameters are the same for different option contracts, the service levels of both the system and the retailer are higher with call option contracts than with bidirectional ones, whereas the retailer’s inventory risk is lower with bidirectional option contracts than with call ones. Under the same conditions stated above, call option contracts can always benefit the supplier, but not the retailer. Owing to the retailer’s dominant position, call option contracts are better choice for the supply chain if the option (exercise) price is low (high), while bidirectional option contracts are more suitable choice for the supply chain if the option (exercise) price is high (low). In addition, an increase in the demand risk would prompt the supplier to increase his production quantity and the retailer to reduce the initial firm order quantity, either with call or bidirectional option contracts.

Highlights

  • The past several decades saw the emergence of the dominant retailers, who turn into the major and largest distributors of the suppliers

  • Because our focal point is on the case with the dominant retailer, this paper focuses on the retailerStackelberg game

  • Due to high variation in the market demand, along with the underlying multiperiod structure, it is a big challenge for the retailer-led supply chain to keep a proper balance between supply and demand

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The past several decades saw the emergence of the dominant retailers, who turn into the major and largest distributors of the suppliers. In the Chinese consumer electronics market, Gome and Suning, two leading companies, have accounted for a growing proportion of sales volume after experiencing an unprecedented development [3] This phenomenon suggests that the bargaining power is shifting into the downstream. The transfer of the leadership deeply affects the decision-making of the players, which differs from the situation with dominant suppliers [5, 6]. Thereby, it has become a significant research field against the background of increasing practical and academic concerns about the retailer-led supply chain

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call