Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of three ultrasound-based techniques (2D-SWE.PLUS, Att.PLUS, Vi.PLUS)for non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation in chronic liver disease (CLD) patients.Materialsand methods: Involving 209 consecutive compensated CLD patients, the study compared these ultrasound methods from Aixplorerwith standard Vibration-controlled Transient Elastography (VCTE) and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) fromFibroscan, alongside non-invasive serological markers. High validity rates were observed in measurements: 99% forVCTE, 89% for 2D-SWE.PLUS/Vi.PLUS, and 96.6% for Att.PLUS. 2D-SWE.PLUS showed a strong correlation with VCTE(R=0.91) and excelled at a lower Stability Index (80%), with optimal cut-offs for moderate and severe fibrosis at 8 kPa and 10kPa, respectively. 2D-SWE.PLUS was superior to Fib4, eLIFT, APRI, BARD, and NFS in detecting advanced CLD. Att.PLUSmoderately correlated with CAP (R=0.47) for steatosis grades, while Viscosity was highly effective in identifying significantfibrosis (AUC=0.87) but less so for inflammation. 2D-SWE.PLUS demonstrated superior diagnostic precisionin liver fibrosis, exceeding other non-invasive markers. Att.PLUS was relatively accurate for liver steatosis, and viscosity moreeffectively indicated fibrosis stages than inflammation in CLD patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call