Abstract

This paper presents a critical comparison of the four major papers on territorial allocation by Bernheim and Whinston, Lommerud and Sorgard, Schroder, and Bhattacharjea and Sinha. The paper adds a new dimension to the analysis as it also studies the impact of a change in distance on collusion and establishes the distance paradox which states that collusion is facilitated with a unit fall in the distance

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call