Abstract

IntroductionPatients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis may demonstrate different degrees of voice perturbation depending on the position of the paralyzed vocal fold. Understanding the effectiveness of voice therapy in this population may be an important coefficient to define the therapeutic approach.ObjectiveTo evaluate the voice therapy effectiveness in the short, medium and long-term in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis and determine the risk factors for voice rehabilitation failure.MethodsProspective study with 61 patients affected by unilateral vocal fold paralysis enrolled. Each subject had voice therapy with an experienced speech pathologist twice a week. A multidimensional assessment protocol was used pre-treatment and in three different times after voice treatment initiation: short-term (1–3 months), medium-term (4–6 months) and long-term (12 months); it included videoendoscopy, maximum phonation time, GRBASI scale, acoustic voice analysis and the portuguese version of the voice handicap index.ResultsMultiple comparisons for GRBASI scale and VHI revealed statistically significant differences, except between medium and long term (p < 0.005). The data suggest that there is vocal improvement over time with stabilization results after 6 months (medium term). From the 28 patients with permanent unilateral vocal fold paralysis, 18 (69.2%) reached complete glottal closure following vocal therapy (p = 0.001). The logistic regression method indicated that the Jitter entered the final model as a risk factor for partial improvement. For every unit of increased Jitter, there was an increase of 0.1% (1.001) of the chance for partial improvement, which means an increase on no full improvement chance during rehabilitation.ConclusionVocal rehabilitation improves perceptual and acoustic voice parameters and voice handicap index, besides favor glottal closure in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. The results were also permanent during the period of 1 year. The Jitter value, when elevated, is a risk factor for the voice therapy success.

Highlights

  • Patients with Unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) may demonstrate different degrees of voice perturbation depending on the position of the paralyzed vocal fold.6---8

  • D’Alatri et al.[20] evaluated the laryngological and acoustical results obtained after voice therapy in 8 patients with UVFP caused by different etiologies

  • The results indicated that Jitter entered the final model as a risk factor for partial improvement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis may demonstrate different degrees of voice perturbation depending on the position of the paralyzed vocal fold. Different surgical techniques are available today: teflon, collagen, hydroxiapatite or autogenous micronized dermis, fat injection, type I thyroplasty and nerve muscle pedicle transfer represent the surgical techniques mainly adopted These studies conduct evaluations mostly in the immediate post-surgery period and three months after surgery.9---18. Patients underwent multidimensional assessment pre and post treatment and the results shown that 51 (68.9%) patients recovered vocal fold mobility, and 23 (31.1%) had persistent paralysis after voice therapy. In this group of patients, complete glottal closure was observed in 5 cases before the voice therapy, and in 13 patients this complete closure was observed only after the therapeutic process (p < 0.0001). Voice handicap index (VHI) values showed a clear and significant improvement and mean MPT increased significantly

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call