Abstract

Complementary ex situ and in situ conservation, including the on-farm alternative, is a highly desired and dynamic strategy that allows the natural evolution of the conserved germplasm. Due to the high costs involved, in addition to the limitations of both economic and human resources, in situ conservation must focus on areas where the greatest benefits are obtained, and the efforts made result in better impacts. Therefore, using spatial multi-criteria analysis and expert knowledge, 22 and 23 criteria were obtained as important for the conservation of wild and cultivated hawthorn, respectively. Criteria weights were calculated by the analytic hierarchy process and expert knowledge. The results showed species richness, phenotypic and ecogeographic diversity, and areas not covered by the official protected areas network were the most important criteria for in situ conservation of wild hawthorn. Prioritized areas were particularly focused in Chiapas, State of Mexico and Morelos. The prioritized areas for the in situ conservation of cultivated hawthorn were mostly defined by criteria such as number of cultivated varieties, number of uses, phenotypic diversity, ecogeographical diversity, and areas with rainfed agriculture. These areas were located mainly in Puebla. From this study, we propose a list of priority areas for the in situ conservation of both cultivated and wild hawthorn.

Highlights

  • Biodiversity has been highlighted as contributing to the productivity, sustainability, and stability of agricultural systems [1,2]

  • Cultivated plants have been mainly preserved through ex situ conservation in germplasm banks, whereas in situ conservation has been carried out in growers’ farms to a lesser extent, and wild species have been mostly conserved in nature reserves [3,8]

  • The three most important criteria for the experts were of the biological type, which were the same obtained by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) pathway

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity has been highlighted as contributing to the productivity, sustainability, and stability of agricultural systems [1,2]. The accelerated loss of biodiversity has caused growing concern, and even a significant extinction of species has been reported due to the consequences of climate change and land use [3] For this reason, the design of strategies and programs for the knowledge, conservation, management, and sustainable use of biodiversity is important [4,5,6,7]. Due to the high costs of the conservation of large areas and the limitations of economic and human resources, in situ conservation must focus on zones where the greatest benefits are obtained and the efforts made result in greater impacts [10,11] For this conservation to be effective, it is important to know and analyze the characteristics of the places where action must be taken to obtain the best results. Spatial planning projects and the allocation of conservation zones must consider social, economic, cultural, ecological, geographical, and biological aspects (biodiversity, species subsets, habitat types, and environmental classes) [15,16,17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call