Multichannel recording of tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potentials

Abstract

The topography of the peaks of tibial-nerve somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) varies among healthy subjects, most likely because of differences in position and orientation of their cortical generator(s). Therefore, amplitude estimation with a standard one- or two-channel derivation is likely to be inaccurate and might partly cause the low sensitivity of SEP amplitude to pathological changes. In this study, we investigate whether 128-channel tibial-nerve SEP recordings can improve amplitude estimation and reduce the coefficient of variation. We recorded tibial-nerve SEPs using a 128-channel EEG system in 48 healthy subjects aged 20 to 70 years (47 provided analyzable data). We compared P39, N50, and P60 amplitudes obtained with a 128-channel analysis method (based on butterfly plots and spatial topographies) with those obtained using a one-channel conventional configuration and analysis. Scalp and earlobe references were compared. Tibial-nerve SEP amplitudes obtained with the 128-channel method were significantly higher as compared to the one-channel conventional method. Consequently, the coefficient of variation was lower for the 128-channel method. In addition, in both methods, the N50-peak amplitude was sometimes hard to identify, because of its low amplitude. Besides, in some subjects, the N50 peak, as obtained with the conventional method, rather seemed to be a period between two positivities rather than an activation peak on itself. The 128-channel method can measure tibial-nerve SEP amplitude more accurately and might therefore be more sensitive to pathological changes. Our results indicate that the N50 component is less useful for clinical practice.