Abstract

The occurrence of extreme climate events in the coming years is modulated by both global warming and internal climate variability. Anticipating changes in frequency and intensity of such events in advance may help minimize the impact on climate-vulnerable sectors and society. Decadal climate predictions have been developed as a source of climate information relevant for decision-making at multi-annual timescales. We evaluate the multi-model forecast quality of the CMIP6 decadal hindcasts in predicting a set of indices measuring different characteristics of temperature and precipitation extremes for the forecast years 1–5. The multi-model ensemble skillfully predicts the temperature extremes over most land regions, while the skill is more limited for precipitation extremes. We further compare the prediction skill for these extreme indices to the skill for mean temperature and precipitation, finding that the extreme indices are predicted with lower skill, particularly those representing the most extreme days. We find only small and region-dependent improvements from model initialization in comparison to historical forcing simulations. This systematic evaluation of decadal hindcasts is essential when providing a climate service based on decadal predictions so that the user is informed on the trustworthiness of the forecasts for each specific region and extreme event.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call