Abstract

Nowadays, many political campaigns are using social influence in order to convince voters to support/oppose a specific candidate/party. In election control via social influence problem, an attacker tries to find a set of limited influencers to start disseminating a political message in a social network of voters. A voter will change his opinion when he receives and accepts the message. In constructive case, the goal is to maximize the number of votes/winners of a target candidate/party, while in destructive case, the attacker tries to minimize them. Recent works considered the problem in different models and presented some hardness and approximation results. In this work, we consider multi-winner election control through social influence on different graph structures and diffusion models, and our goal is to maximize/minimize the number of winners in our target party. We show that the problem is hard to approximate when voters’ connections form a graph, and the diffusion model is the linear threshold model. We also prove the same result considering an arborescence under independent cascade model. Moreover, we present a dynamic programming algorithm for the cases that the voting system is a variation of straight-party voting, and voters form a tree.

Highlights

  • Social media is an integral part of nowadays life

  • We presented a polynomial-time algorithm based on the dynamic programming approach to find the maximum difference of votes for our target party before and after diffusion

  • We know that S ⊆ V after the diffusion; otherwise, if there is a node v0 ∈ V 0 ∩ S we can replace it with its incoming neighbor v ∈ V such that (v, v0 ) ∈ E0 and we get at least the same value for MoVc, DoWc

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social media is an integral part of nowadays life. No one can ignore the effect of social media on different aspects of our life. Considered the problem when the attacker knows a probability distribution over the candidates instead of the exact preferences list, under LTM [8] They showed that maximizing/minimizing the expected probability to vote for a target candidate is hard to approximate within any constant factor under unique game with small set expansion conjecture. Abouei Mehrizi and D’Angelo showed that in multi-winner elections, when the manipulator wants to maximize/minimize the number of winners in his target party, the problem is inapproximable under ICM, except P = NP [9] They presented some constant factor approximation algorithms when the voting system is similar to the straight-party voting.

Background
Linear Threshold Model
Independent Cascade Model
Multi-Winner Election Control
Multi-Winner Election Control under LTM
Multi-Winner Election Control under ICM
Objective Functions
Multi-Winner Election Control on Graph under LTM
Multi-Winner Election Control on Arborescence under ICM
Multi-Winner Election Control on Tree Using Straight-Party Voting
Multi-Winner Election Control Using Straight-Party Voting under LTM
Maximizing DoV in Straight-Party Voting under LTM
Maximizing MoV in Straight-Party Voting under LTM
Multi-Winner Election Control Using Straight-Party Voting under ICM
Maximizing DoV in Straight-Party Voting under ICM
Maximizing MoV in Straight-Party Voting under ICM
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call