Abstract

Most observers of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s political situation have focused only on the problems that the Dayton Peace Accord created for the normal functioning of this Southeastern European state, but a workable solution is yet to be proposed.
 The Accord achieved peace by blocking any ability for effective governing and by diminishing the Bosnian state capacity through an excessive dispersion of power with an uncommon constitutional focus on internationalism, and an erroneous type of pluralism that undermines the normal functioning of a democracy. The solution for these problems is to be found by adjusting the procedural selection of the United Nations High Representative, who is the primary actor directly responsible for the implementation of the Accord, both in terms of the letter and intent of the document, and this paper explains how that change can be made and what problems it will resolve.

Highlights

  • "Juan" Cole is an American academic and commentator on the modern Middle East and South Asia. He is a professor of history and director of the Center for South Asian Studies at the University of Michigan

  • Cole became interested in Islam and Arabic while a teenager living in Eritrea

  • According to the editorial subtitle of the publisher, Sarajevo-based Kupola, which published this book within its edition Stubovi vremena, it is a “Biography of the Prophet, a.s., as a harbinger of tolerance and peace amid the Byzantine-Persian wars”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

"Juan" Cole (born October 23, 1952) is an American academic and commentator on the modern Middle East and South Asia. He is a professor of history and director of the Center for South Asian Studies at the University of Michigan. Cole became interested in Islam and Arabic while a teenager living in Eritrea.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call