Abstract
Computer display screen image quality is known to vary widely. Attempts have been made the world over at defining objective scales to better assess image sharpness and clarity. The experiments reported here were stimulated by the recent US adoption of MTFA≥5 as a minimum quality criteria. A series of ten hard-copy photographs and seven retrievable display screens were developed for a monochrome, cathode ray tube terminal that differed only in objective image quality. This series of display screen images was presented to 22 office workers, who were asked to provide a subjective image quality judgement in the form of a numerical scale ranking. The subjects were instructed to match the display screen with photographs that they estimated to be most comparable in image quality. Finally, the subjects were asked to specify what they considered to be the minimum acceptable visual quality. It was found that the subjects could accurately rank low and minimum quality display images and that their subjective visual quality judgement corresponded well with the objective MTFA quality scale. The minimum acceptable display quality specified by the office worker group corresponded to MTFA≥7, which is substantially higher than the US criteria and would disquality 40% of the video display terminals currently marketed in Sweden.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call