Abstract

Mobile Router (MR) mobility supported by Network Mobility Basic Support Protocol (NEMO BS) is a Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) extension that supports Host Mobility. Proposed Multihoming and Route Optimization for MANEMO (MROM) scheme is designed to provide Route Optimization (RO) and Multihomed in NEMO architectures. This paper proposes two novel schemes; MANEMO routing scheme and Multihoming-based scheme. These are to provide support for next generation networks. The proposed MROM scheme differs from other schemes for NEMO environment because it considers the requirements of more application flows parameters as packet lost delivery, handoff delay as well as throughput). Another difference is that not only the network infrastructure can begin the functionality of flow routing, but also an Edge Mobile Router (EMR) can do this flow for routing. Moreover, it utilizes the state of the art and presently active access network to perform the separation of each flow in mobile network. Thus, proposed MROM exhibits multihoming features and improves handoff performance by initiating flow-based fast registration process in NEMO environment. A handoff method is proposed with enhanced functionalities of the Local Mobility Anchors (LMA), Mobile Routers (MRs) and signaling messages with a view to achieve continuous connectivity through handoff in NEMO. Both analytical and simulation approaches are used. Analytical evaluation is carried out to analyze packet delivery lost and handoff delay of our proposed scheme. It was also shown that cost of signaling messages and packet delivery are contributing to total handoff cost. At the simulation part, network simulator 3 (NS 3) has been used as the tool to get performance metrics that have been considered like packet delivery ratio, handoff delay, and packet loss. Our proposed scheme (MROM) has been benchmarking to the standard NEMO BS Protocol and P-NEMO. In this paper, we discuss proposed MROM for next generation networks, providing detailed analysis with a numerical model, proposed MROM, by maximizing the handoff performance, has been justified to have better mobility support than the ordinary NEMO BS Protocol and PNEMO.

Highlights

  • Today, mobile technology with smarts devices rapidly growth the network traffic volumes in terms of mobile data, So the mobility support becomes an important research and attracting great considerations

  • The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has created a “Network Mobility (NEMO) Work Group” in order to present a mobility solution regarding to the view of MIPv6 which deals with Mobile Router (MR) instead of a single mobile node [2,3]

  • Solutions for MANEMO have already been proposed within the IETF that is possibly related to current work in IETF such as routing protocols (i.e., OSPF), Network Mobility support (i.e., NEMO), MANET and Autoconfiguration (i.e. AUTOCON), and multiinterfaces in IPv6 (i.e., MONAMI6) [5][7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mobile technology with smarts devices rapidly growth the network traffic volumes in terms of mobile data, So the mobility support becomes an important research and attracting great considerations. Solutions for MANEMO have already been proposed within the IETF that is possibly related to current work in IETF such as routing protocols (i.e., OSPF), Network Mobility support (i.e., NEMO), MANET and Autoconfiguration (i.e. AUTOCON), and multiinterfaces in IPv6 (i.e., MONAMI6) [5][7]. In Nested NEMO, the sub-optimal routing issues are increased because the number of MRs and its MNNs attached to mobile networks and required to maintain connection with their home networks [12,13]. As shown from Pseudo code, the optimal path for our proposed scheme divided into the three stages: 2.1 Infrastructure optimization (Stage #1) This stage focuses on infrastructure optimisation by utilising new functionality of a home agent of the Exit Mobile Router as a centralize HA namely; Proxy HA to handle inefficient routing matters which include redundant tunnelling packet overhead (extra IP header), packet delivery lost and scalability.

Packet Queuing
Proposed MROM Based Multihoming
VI E WiFi AP1
Performance Analysis of the Proposed MROM
Results and Discussion of Performance Evaluation
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call