Abstract

The presence of extranodal spread in metastatic nodes significantly affects treatment planning and prognosis of the patient with head and neck cancer. We attempted to evaluate the predictive capability of MR imaging for the extranodal spread in the neck. We retrospectively studied MR images from 109 patients with histologically proved metastatic nodes, of which 39 were positive for extranodal spread. We assessed 47 extranodal spread-positive and 130 extranodal spread-negative metastatic nodes by using the following MR imaging findings as the possible criteria for extranodal spread: 1) nodal size (short-axis diameter); 2) obliterated fat spaces between the metastatic node and adjacent tissues, such as the muscles and skin on T1-weighted images ("vanishing border" sign); 3) the presence of high-intensity signals in the interstitial tissues around and extending from a metastatic node on fat-suppressed T2-weighted images ("flare" sign); and 4) an irregular nodal margin on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images ("shaggy margin"). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictive criteria for extranodal spread. Nodal size, shaggy margin, and flare sign criteria were independent and significant MR imaging findings suggestive of extranodal spread in the metastatic nodes. We obtained 77% sensitivity and 93% specificity with the flare sign, 65% sensitivity and 99% specificity with the shaggy margin, and 80% sensitivity and 85% specificity with the size criterion (cutoff point = 16 mm). Fat-suppressed T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images are useful for the detection of extranodal spread in metastatic nodes in the neck.

Highlights

  • AND PURPOSE: The presence of extranodal spread in metastatic nodes significantly affects treatment planning and prognosis of the patient with head and neck cancer

  • Nodal size, shaggy margin, and flare sign criteria were independent and significant MR imaging findings suggestive of extranodal spread in the metastatic nodes

  • Extranodal spread (ENS) is one of the high-risk features in patients with head and neck cancer because the presence of ENS is associated with an increase in the incidence of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis.[2,3,4]

Read more

Summary

Methods

We retrospectively studied MR images from 109 patients with histologically proved metastatic nodes, of which 39 were positive for extranodal spread. Subjects We evaluated the MR images of 116 patients with head and neck cancers, who had undergone MR examinations for staging of nodal metastasis from 2002 to 2006. Of these patients, 7 were excluded from the study due to significant motion artifacts in the MR images, leaving images from 109 patients (20 women and 89 men; average age, 66 Ϯ 10 years) with histologically proved metastatic nodes in the neck. ENS-positive nodes were defined as those with macroscopic or microscopic cancer spreads beyond the nodal capsules

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call