Abstract
You have accessJournal of UrologyStone Disease: Epidemiology & Evaluation II1 Apr 2017MP95-16 RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN URINARY METABOLIC RISK FACTORS FOR NEPHROLITHIASIS Andrew Cohen, Melanie Adamsky, James McGinnis, Kristin Bergsland, Fredric Coe, Elaine Worcester, and Anna Zisman Andrew CohenAndrew Cohen More articles by this author , Melanie AdamskyMelanie Adamsky More articles by this author , James McGinnisJames McGinnis More articles by this author , Kristin BergslandKristin Bergsland More articles by this author , Fredric CoeFredric Coe More articles by this author , Elaine WorcesterElaine Worcester More articles by this author , and Anna ZismanAnna Zisman More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3018AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Over the past two decades, the prevalence of kidney stones in black non-Hispanics has increased by 150%, yet there is a paucity of literature regarding African American (AA) stone-formers. Small studies suggest certain urinary parameters do not significantly differ between racial groups. We asked whether AA stone formers have any meaningful differences in urine and serum metabolic parameters when compared to Caucasians (C). METHODS AA patients with known stone composition undergoing metabolic stone evaluation (at least three 24-hour urine collections per patient and paired serum studies) were retrospectively identified by self-reported race from 1995-2016 and sex and age-matched 1:2 to C patients with known stone composition from the same years. Metabolic data were compared between groups by stone type and race using ANOVA. Majority stone type was defined as >50% of composition. RESULTS Fifty-five AA (calcium oxalate (CaOx)=29, Ca phosphate (CaP)=9, Uric acid=17) and 125 matched C (CaOx=81, CaP=27, Uric acid=17) had complete pre-treatment metabolic data. Despite similar supersaturation (SS) for their stone type, AA had significantly lower 24-hr urine volumes than C (1.5 vs. 1.9L, p<0.001). Likewise, 24-hr calcium (Ca) levels, were significantly lower than those for C (135 vs. 225 mg, p<0.0001). Urine oxalate and citrate did not differ by ANOVA. Significant differences between races persisted in volume when analyzed by stone type. CaOx AA had lower urine Ca than C, but oxalate and citrate excretions did not differ. Urine Ca did not differ for CaP stone formers by race. For uric acid stones, AA had lower uric acid excretion and uric acid SS but higher urine pH. Serum phosphate also differed by race, and was lower in AA males than in C males; for women this did not differ. CONCLUSIONS While physical chemistry dictates that SS drives risk for stone formation, we demonstrate racial differences in determinants of SS. Previously unknown and significant metabolic differences exist between AA and Caucasian stone formers. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1292 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Andrew Cohen More articles by this author Melanie Adamsky More articles by this author James McGinnis More articles by this author Kristin Bergsland More articles by this author Fredric Coe More articles by this author Elaine Worcester More articles by this author Anna Zisman More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.