MP18-05 EXTRA VOIDS IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER

Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP18-05 EXTRA VOIDS IN PATIENTS WITH OVERACTIVE BLADDER Kevin Rychik, Max Edeson, Edward Smith, Jeffrey Weiss, Wade Bushman, and Jerry Blaivas Kevin RychikKevin Rychik More articles by this author , Max EdesonMax Edeson More articles by this author , Edward SmithEdward Smith More articles by this author , Jeffrey WeissJeffrey Weiss More articles by this author , Wade BushmanWade Bushman More articles by this author , and Jerry BlaivasJerry Blaivas More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002551.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: We previously defined two new bladder diary metrics: the voiding frequency index (VFI) calculated by dividing the 24-hour urine voided volume (24HVV) by the maximum voided volume (MVV), and extra voids index (EVI) calculated as the difference between the actual number of voids in 24 hours (ANV) and VFI rounded down1. The EVI is therefore a metric for “extra voids,” The purpose of this study was to compare the number of extra voids in patients with OAB to asymptomatic reference patients2,3, and to characterize and quantify their voids according to urgency based on the Urgency Perception Score (UPS)4. METHODS: This was a retrospective database study of patients diagnosed with OAB who completed a 24-hour bladder diary (24HBD) and lower urinary tract symptom score questionnaire (LUTSS) using a smartphone app from 2015-2021. Criteria for a diagnosis of OAB were an OAB sub-score of ≥ 8 or ≥ 3 on one or more of questions 3 – 6 of the LUTSS. The ANV, VFI, and EVI values were calculated and compared to the same bladder diary metrics obtained from a cohort of asymptomatic reference patients 2,3. Then, we analyzed 24HBDs from a sub-set of 100 patients with OAB to classify each void according to the UPS, (grade 0 = “convenience voids,” grades 1 & 2 = “non-urgency voids,” grades 3 & 4 = “urgency voids”) and compared the mean UPS in men and women with a two sample t-test. RESULTS: There were 511 patients in the database of whom 400 had a diagnosis of OAB; 19 were excluded because of erroneous data, leaving a cohort of 381 patients who met all entry criteria. ANV, VFI and EVI were greater in men and women with OAB compared to asymptomatic reference men and women 2,3 (Table 1). When quantified according to UPS, 21% of voids in men were due to urgency, compared to 36% in women (Figures 1, 2). The mean UPS was greater in women (2.1) than men (1.8) (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: EVI is a quantitative metric for the extra voids in a 24-hour period. Patients with OAB void about 4 times more daily than patients without OAB, including 2 extra voids, quantified by an EVI of 5 in patients with OAB compared to an EVI of 3 in references. The majority of voids in both sexes are non-urgency voids, although less so in women, and perhaps, conscious or subconscious attempt to ameliorate OAB symptoms. These data may be useful in developing therapeutic strategies including behavioral techniques and new therapies directed at alleviating urinary symptoms as well as prompting greater research into why people void as often as they do. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e296 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Kevin Rychik More articles by this author Max Edeson More articles by this author Edward Smith More articles by this author Jeffrey Weiss More articles by this author Wade Bushman More articles by this author Jerry Blaivas More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...