Abstract
Transboundary frontiers often contain wildlife habitats that are fractured by geopolitical borders, which could have adverse effects on the wildlife that inhabit those areas. We examined the movement, breeding, roosting, and diet of 15 GPS-tagged barn owls (Tyto alba) along the Israeli-Jordanian and Israeli-Palestinian Authority borders. Our results showed that 80% of the barn owls hunted across the border. On average, the owls engaged in 5.4 hunting trips per night, 16% of which were cross-border excursions, and they crossed the borders as frequently as expected randomly, highlighting the importance of wildlife protection on all sides. Hunting movement, rather than cross-border activity, had an effect on the annual reproductive success and diet composition. Specifically, female owls that spent more time at the nest and engaged in longer distance hunting trips had higher reproductive success. Eighty percent of the females roosted outside of the nest box at a median distance of 908 m (range = 199–4112 m). Only 13.3% of the owls (2/15 owls) roosted across the border. These results increase our understanding of the movement, breeding, and roosting behavior of a non-migratory avian raptor. However, a serious lack of cooperation and communication between bordering countries hampers our ability to understand the full effects of differing environmental policies on a species that knows no borders.
Highlights
Transboundary frontiers are landscapes artificially fractured by geopolitical borders that rarely contain an ecological foundation (Liu et al 2020)
During the 2014-2015 breeding seasons, 15 female barn owls (6 in 2014 and 9 in 2015) breeding in Israel were trapped inside nest boxes and their sex determined given that only females have a brood patch that is used for incubation
We found no significant relationship between the distance of the roosting site to the border and reproductive success (GLMMTMB: Est = 0.001, df = 11, SE = 0.001, z = 1.433, p = 0.152)
Summary
Transboundary frontiers are landscapes artificially fractured by geopolitical borders that rarely contain an ecological foundation (Liu et al 2020). These boundaries often overlap with endemic species’ habitats (Fowler et al 2018) and may consist of physical barriers along international borders, such as the USMexico border wall. There may be no physical barrier, but the two countries may have vastly different policies regarding wildlife management and conservation (Arrondo et al 2018). Transboundary frontiers can occur in conflict zones, increasing the risk to the wildlife that inhabit those areas. Movement of species between these regions could put them at heightened risk
Submitted Version (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have