Abstract

(1) Background: Motion planning is an important part of exoskeleton control that improves the wearer’s safety and comfort. However, its usage introduces the problem of trajectory planning. The objective of trajectory planning is to generate the reference input for the motion-control system. This review explores the methods of trajectory planning for exoskeleton control. In order to reduce the number of surveyed papers, this review focuses on the upper limbs, which require refined three-dimensional motion planning. (2) Methods: A systematic search covering the last 20 years was conducted in Ei Compendex, Inspect-IET, Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Science-Direct. The search strategy was to use and combine terms “trajectory planning”, “upper limb”, and ”exoskeleton” as high-level keywords. “Trajectory planning” and “motion planning” were also combined with the following keywords: “rehabilitation”, “humanlike motion“, “upper extremity“, “inverse kinematic“, and “learning machine “. (3) Results: A total of 67 relevant papers were discovered. Results were then classified into two main categories of methods to plan trajectory: (i) Approaches based on Cartesian motion planning, and inverse kinematics using polynomial-interpolation or optimization-based methods such as minimum-jerk, minimum-torque-change, and inertia-like models; and (ii) approaches based on “learning by demonstration” using machine-learning techniques such as supervised learning based on neural networks, and learning methods based on hidden Markov models, Gaussian mixture models, and dynamic motion primitives. (4) Conclusions: Various methods have been proposed to plan the trajectories for upper-limb exoskeleton robots, but most of them plan the trajectory offline. The review approach is general and could be extended to lower limbs. Trajectory planning has the advantage of extending the applicability of therapy robots to home usage (assistive exoskeletons); it also makes it possible to mitigate the shortages of medical caregivers and therapists, and therapy costs. In this paper, we also discuss challenges associated with trajectory planning: kinematic redundancy and incompatibility, and the trajectory-optimization problem. Commonly, methods based on the computation of swivel angles and other methods rely on the relationship (e.g., coordinated or synergistic) between the degrees of freedom used to resolve kinematic redundancy for exoskeletons. Moreover, two general solutions, namely, the self-tracing configuration of the joint axis and the alignment-free configuration of the joint axis, which add the appropriate number of extra degrees of freedom to the mechanism, were employed to improve the kinematic incompatibility between human and exoskeleton. Future work will focus on online trajectory planning and optimal control. This will be done because very few online methods were found in the scope of this study.

Highlights

  • Developments in assistive robotic devices offer enormous prospects in medical fields, such as surgical, rehabilitation, and assistive robotics [1]

  • Trajectory planning is an important part of the control of intelligent robotic systems such as exoskeleton robots

  • It has been proven in the literature that trajectory planning helps to better control the movement of exoskeleton joints and improve the ADLs of stroke patients, helping them return to society and their occupation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Developments in assistive robotic devices offer enormous prospects in medical fields, such as surgical, rehabilitation, and assistive robotics [1]. Many robotic devices, referred to as exoskeletons, have been developed for patient rehabilitation and physical assistance. Their efficacy has been proved in these fields. In any autonomous robotic system, trajectory planning is of crucial importance in moving the robot from its initial position to the desired position because it finds the desired trajectory linking the two positions or configurations (start and goal) In robotic systems such as exoskeleton robots, the motion planner generates the desired trajectory, and the control algorithm ensures that the robot tracks this planned trajectory (see Figure 1). Exoskeletons were applied in rehabilitation for training rather than to help therapists to perform training on patients Even if their effect was satisfactory, this method required the presence of the therapist [3,6].

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call