Abstract

Motion dazzle describes high-contrast patterns (e.g. zigzags on snakes and dazzle paint on World War I ships) that do not conceal an object, but inhibit an observer's perception of its motion. However, there is limited evidence for this phenomenon. Locusts have a pair of descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) neurons which respond to predator-like looming objects and trigger escape responses. Within the network providing input to a DCMD, separate channels are excited when moving edges cause areas of the visual field to brighten or darken, respectively, and these stimuli interact antagonistically. When a looming square has an upper half and lower half that are both darker than background, it elicits a stronger DCMD response than the upper half does alone. However, when a looming square has a darker-than-background upper half and a brighter-than-background lower half, it elicits a weaker DCMD response than its upper half does alone. This effect allows high-contrast patterns to weaken and delay DCMD response parameters implicated in escape decisions, and is analogous to motion dazzle. However, the motion dazzle effect does not provide the best means of motion camouflage, because uniform bright squares, or low-contrast squares, elicit weaker DCMD responses than high-contrast, half dark, half bright squares.

Highlights

  • Motion dazzle describes high-contrast patterns that do not conceal an object, but interfere with an observer’s perception of its motion [1,2,3,4]

  • Darker-than-background square lower halves and increasingly brighterthan-background square lower halves, both elicited increasingly strong descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) responses when they loomed without a discernible upper half (x-axis)

  • There was an antagonistic effect on the DCMD response when the patterning of a looming stimulus caused its expanding edges to elicit both ON and OFF stimulation to different areas of the eye

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motion dazzle describes high-contrast patterns that do not conceal an object, but interfere with an observer’s perception of its motion [1,2,3,4]. There, high DCMD spike rates are implicated in triggering emergency behavioural responses to looming threats [14]. An early investigation found that when ON and OFF stimuli were provided at the same time, they had antagonistic effects on the DCMD response [9].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.