Abstract

Abstract The modern definition of brain death points this as what determines the death of the individual, who leaves behind a body that, although functional, is no longer a part of him, and can, thus, be subjected to termination of life support and organ and tissue harvesting. This article seeks to verify if medicine students receive adequate technical and ethical training to deal with the brain death diagnosis. To this end, a cross-sectional study was carried out, by applying a questionary, via internet, to medicine students. Of the 82 students that filled the research, 87% correctly identified the brain death diagnosis, but up to 46% could not define the right conduct in the face of the diagnosis. The bioethical discussion about death, focusing themes such as terminality, ending, and care, would be a viable alternative to solve this apparent flaw of medical training.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call