Abstract
Based on an analysis of 41 placement essays, this study explores the contrasting discourse requirements of two seemingly comparable essay topics, highlighting the construction of stance. While one prompt demanded primarily that students make judgments of necessity and obligation (deontic stance), the other prompt required students to engage primarily with questions of possibility and probability (epistemic stance). The contrasting rhetorical and linguistic demands of the two essay topics shed light on observed differences in student scores, pointing to possible insights for writing task design.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call