Abstract

This paper argues for the moral significance of the notion of an evil person or character. First, I argue that accounts of evil character ought to support a robust bad/evil distinction; yet existing theories cannot plausibly do so. Consequentialist and related theories also fail to account for some cru- cial properties of evil persons. Second, I sketch an intuitively plausible affective-motivational ac- count of evil character. Third, I argue that the notion of evil character, thus conceived, denotes a sig- nificant moral category. It marks one end of a moral continuum that has, at the opposite pole, the saint. Fourth, I argue that frequent evildoing accounts confuse this moral space with another: that defined by the moral hero and the moral criminal.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call