Moore's paradoxes, Evans's principle and self-knowledge

Abstract

Alston, W. 1986. Epistemic circularity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 1–30. Beebee, H. 2001. Transfer of warrant, begging the question and semantic externalism. Philosophical Quarterly 51: 356–74. Bergmann, M. Forthcoming. Epistemic circularity, malignant and benign. Young Epistemologist Prize Winning Essay, Rutgers Epistemology Conference 2003, forthcoming in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Available at http://philosophy.rutgers.edu/EVENTS/EPIS2003/Bergmann.doc or Bergmann’s web page, http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~bergmann/forthcoming%20papers. Brown, J. 2003. The reductio argument and transmission of warrant. In New Essays on Semantic Externalism, Scepticism, and Self-Knowledge, ed. S. Nuccetelli, 117– 30. Mass.: MIT Press. Cohen, S. 2002. Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 309–29. Davies, M. 2000. Externalism and a priori knowledge. In New Essays on the A Priori, ed. P. Boghossian and C. Peacocke, 384–432. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fumerton, R. 1995. Metaepistemology and Scepticism. Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield. McLaughlin, B. 2003. McKinsey’s challenge, warrant transmission, and skepticism. In New Essays on Semantic Externalism, Scepticism, and Self-Knowledge, ed. S. Nuccetelli, 79–96. Mass.: MIT Press. Pryor, J. Forthcoming. Is Moore’s argument an example of transmission failure? Vogel, J. 2000. Reliabilism levelled. Journal of Philosophy 97: 602–23. Wright, C. 2000. Cogency and question-begging: some reflections on McKinsey’s paradox, and Putnam’s proof. Philosophical Issues 10: 140–63. Wright, C. 2002. Anti-sceptics simple and subtle: Moore and McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 330–48. Wright, C. 2003. Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference. In New Essays on Semantic Externalism, Scepticism, and Self-Knowledge, ed. S. Nuccetelli, 57–78. Mass.: MIT Press.