Abstract
To determine persistence of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) on a hematology-oncology ward and to determine the value of phenotypic and genotypic procedures for establishing clonality among CNS isolates. Strains of CNS isolated from bacteremic patients (n = 139) were typed by biochemical reactivity, antibiotic susceptibility, DNA macrorestriction analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and arbitrary primed polymerase chain reaction (AP PCR). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were subgrouped in a random collection (n = 20) used for the evaluation of the typing procedures and a collection of 119 CNS isolates from hematologic patients displaying multiple bacteremic episodes. Analysis of the reference collection demonstrated the usefulness of the DNA typing procedures, indicating that AP PCR and PFGE can be used for epidemiologic typing of CNS in a concordant fashion. Certain strains appeared to be permanent colonizers of the hematology ward or ward-related personnel. In individual patients, persistent colonization by a single type was demonstrated. However, a number of patients also experienced bacteremic episodes caused by CNS belonging to different types. We conclude that monitoring of CNS infections on a hematology ward by various genotypic techniques provides insight into nosocomial epidemiology and elucidates the complexity of the infections taking place. DNA typing is preferred over phenotypic procedures and can identify persistent CNS strains in a given location.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.