Abstract
AbstractAn earlier study of ours demonstrated polygenic control of habitat preference between sympatric populations of an estuarine amphipod (Stanhope et al. 1992). Knowledge of the ecological history in this estuary suggested that two new and distinct habitat types (wood debris and Fucus) had been formed immediately adjacent to each other, in an area which was previously the habitat type common to the rest of the estuary (bank). This suggested the possibility that the ancestral population had been split into two resource specialists (disruptive selection on habitat preference). The genetic relatedness of these three populations (the proposed ancestor and the two proposed descendants) and six others occupying the same three habitat types were investigated on a regional geographic scale, using an extensive set of genomic DNA RFLPs. These data were combined with measures of habitat preference (including genetic tests) in the additional populations. A very strongly supported phylogeographic tree, unequivocally supported a shift in habitat preference in the wood‐debris population of this estuary. The data did not, however, support the hypothesis of disruptive selection on the ancestor (bank) with a consequent split into two resource specialists. Instead, it clearly indicated that the occupants of the Fucus habitat type were members of a habitat specific race, and thus their presence in this estuary reflected the expansion of an old resource base. Furthermore, the combined RFLP and habitat preference data, for all nine populations, indicated that the same polygenically based shift in habitat preference that had occurred in the original estuary had occurred independently, in another estuary, 700 km removed, that had similar environmental circumstances.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.