Abstract

The phylogenetic relationships within the subclass of Elasmobranchii are under question within the academic community and their systematic classification based on morphological, or physiological characteristics has not yet been fully justified. Modern cladistic studies suggested that batoids are derived sharks, a taxonomic status known as the Hypnosqualean hypothesis. The main purpose of this study was to address this issue using a data set of aligned, directly sequenced, mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II. Maximum Likelihood, Maximum Parsimony, Minimum Evolution and Bayesian inference were implemented for tree reconstructions. The results provided evidence that supported the rejection of the above hypothesis, in accordance with other recent molecular phylogenetic studies. More specifically Rajiformes species were presented as separate lineages from sharks. Prionace species on the other hand was grouped within Carcharhinoformes, which was clustered as sister group to Lamniformes. COI and COII regions supported, monophylies of Squaliformes and paraphylies of Carchariniformes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call