Abstract

BackgroundPlant genes that provide a different response to a similar dehydration stress illustrate the concept of transcriptional ‘dehydration stress memory’. Pre-exposing a plant to a biotic stress or a stress-signaling hormone may increase transcription from response genes in a future stress, a phenomenon known as ‘gene priming’. Although known that primed transcription is preceded by accumulation of H3K4me3 marks at primed genes, what mechanism provides for their appearance before the transcription was unclear. How augmented transcription is achieved, whether/how the two memory phenomena are connected at the transcriptional level, and whether similar molecular and/or epigenetic mechanisms regulate them are fundamental questions about the molecular mechanisms regulating gene expression.ResultsAlthough the stress hormone jasmonic acid (JA) was unable to induce transcription of tested dehydration stress response genes, it strongly potentiated transcription from specific ABA-dependent ‘memory’ genes. We elucidate the molecular mechanism causing their priming, demonstrate that stalled RNA polymerase II and H3K4me3 accumulate as epigenetic marks at the JA-primed ABA-dependent genes before actual transcription, and describe how these events occur mechanistically. The transcription factor MYC2 binds to the genes in response to both dehydration stress and to JA and determines the specificity of the priming. The MEDIATOR subunit MED25 links JA-priming with dehydration stress response pathways at the transcriptional level. Possible biological relevance of primed enhanced transcription from the specific memory genes is discussed.ConclusionsThe biotic stress hormone JA potentiated transcription from a specific subset of ABA-response genes, revealing a novel aspect of the JA- and ABA-signaling pathways’ interactions. H3K4me3 functions as an epigenetic mark at JA-primed dehydration stress response genes before transcription. We emphasize that histone and epigenetic marks are not synonymous and argue that distinguishing between them is important for understanding the role of chromatin marks in genes’ transcriptional performance. JA-priming, specifically of dehydration stress memory genes encoding cell/membrane protective functions, suggests it is an adaptational response to two different environmental stresses.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13072-016-0057-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Plant genes that provide a different response to a similar dehydration stress illustrate the concept of transcriptional ‘dehydration stress memory’

  • The molecular mechanism of this priming is based on the jasmonic acid (JA)-triggered deposition of the basal transcriptional machinery to the promoters of abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent memory genes

  • JA-activated binding of MYC2 to subunit 25 of the MEDIATOR complex (MED25) recruits the MEDIATOR complex to specific dehydration stress response promoters, where the MEDIATOR recruits TATA binding protein (TBP) (PIC) and facilitates the phosphorylation at Ser5 of the Pol II CTD; on its part, Ser5PPol II contributes to the establishment of H3K4me3 at 5′-end nucleosomes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant genes that provide a different response to a similar dehydration stress illustrate the concept of transcriptional ‘dehydration stress memory’. Pre-exposing plants to a variety of pathogens, herbivory, or pre-treatment with biotic stress hormones, i.e., salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonic acid (JA), may result in higher resistance and stronger responses from defenserelated genes in future attacks, a phenomenon known as ‘priming’ (called ‘enhanced defense’) [6,7,8]. 1963 of the response genes produced significantly different amounts of transcripts compared to the amounts produced under the first stress. These genes defined the dehydration stress transcription ‘memory’ category in Arabidopsis; about 4500 genes provided similar transcriptional responses to each stress representing the ‘non-memory’ response category [9]. The operational criterion used for the term ‘transcriptional memory,’ is that transcriptional responses to similar stresses must be different

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call