Abstract

Abstract Zircon dating is commonly used to quantify timescales of magmatic processes, but our appreciation of the consequences of internal magma body dynamics lags behind ever-increasing analytical capabilities. In particular, it has been shown that crystal accumulation and melting of cumulates by recharge-delivered heat may affect melt chemistry within magma bodies. We considered the effect of such processes on zircon solubility in highly evolved silicate melts of diverse chemical affinities. Our modeling shows that in most cases cumulate melting perpetuates the zircon saturation behavior of the first melts emplaced at shallow storage levels. Once cumulate melting is established, the ease of saturating in zircon is controlled by cumulate mineralogy, with a particular effect of the amount of cumulate zircon and its availability for resorption. The fidelity of zircon as a recorder of magma system history thus depends on both the system’s chemical affinity and mineralogy, and the history itself.

Highlights

  • Knowledge of zircon stability is key to the modern understanding of magmatic systems

  • While it is possible to predict how certain chemical parameters would behave as a result of this likely ubiquitous process, such predictions are rarely incorporated into interpretations of zircon data. We address this issue by exploring the influence of such crystal–melt dynamics on the composition of evolved silicate melts and their zircon saturation behavior

  • We will show that the ability of these melts to reach and maintain zircon saturation is defined largely by their placement in M-Zr space during crustal storage, and the mineralogy of their cumulates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge of zircon stability is key to the modern understanding of magmatic systems. Most common magmatic evolutionary trends generate melts that approach the appropriate zircon saturation curves at M between ∼1.3 and 2.5, and their most differentiated, zirconundersaturated derivatives generally trend away from the composition of their dominant mineral phase, alkali feldspar (M ∼1.7, Zr = 0).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.